In which I interview myself (part 3 of 2)

Previously:

In which I interview myself (part 1 of 2)
In which I interview myself (part 2 of 2)

Dopple: Here we are again.

Me: I wish I could quit you.

Dopple: Wouldn’t that be impossible, since we’re the same person? Or is it a metaphor?

Me: It just seemed like a good place for a funny quote.

Dopple: We were previously talking about your writing but I’d like to touch on your acting.

Me: My acting was touched, yes.

Dopple: You took drama in school.

Me: I yearned to be dramatic so it was a good fit. In elementary school it was just dumb skits and variety shows and it was all goofy fun. In junior high we started doing more demanding material, like Puss in Boots. Wait, that’s not a good example. We did stuff like The Boy Comes Home, a drama about a young solider returning after fighting in World War I. I played the boy. It wasn’t much of a stretch.

Dopple: Talk about the inevitable drama off-stage.

Me: The drama teacher in junior high liked me, so I typically got cast for most of the lead parts. I was the cat in Puss in Boots and Androcles in Androcles and the Lion. A friend of mine was not well-liked by the teacher because he was…a scamp, let’s say. Yes. Very scampy. Most of the drama students were female, so she was forced to cast him in each production because there were so few guys (and several couldn’t act, they apparently just wanted to hang around with the girls), usually as some kind of comic relief. This friend would commit subtle acts of sabotage and generally drive her crazy. To be fair, she was very open to being driven crazy by him. But in terms of off-stage drama, there really wasn’t a lot, mostly just the usual anxiety about how nothing seemed to be pulling together and opening night was only days away. Oh, and all the girls kept pulling on my tail when I was Puss in Boots. I hated that. But I still remember the line, “Unlike humans, cats only speak when they have something important to say.” Which is pretty much true.

Dopple: You continued on acting in high school?

Me: Yes. In high school it was no longer Drama, it was Acting. I don’t know why. My friend and I switched roles (ho ho) in high school because the acting teacher liked him and seemed indifferent to me. I got to be supporting characters while he got the leads. We did a pretty good run on Dark of the Moon in which I played Floyd Allen, the brother (supporting character) of Barbara Allen (one of the leads). My friend played the brimstone and fire Preacher Haggler. I don’t know if the casting was meant to be ironic or not. We had a great moment during one performance when four of us were on stage and one of the others missed a line, causing a large and vital part of the scene to be skipped over. We had to somehow get back to it. For a few terrifying moments we stood there in silence wondering what to do. I then blurted out an improvised line: “I bet you want to get Barbara married.” He grabbed onto it like a shark snacking on a harp seal. “That’s EXACTLY what I want to do!” And then we covered the missing material and it was all good. I sort of miss the excitement of that, a live performance where things can go wrong and you have to think on your feet.

Dopple: And you continued acting into college?

Me: Yes. I went to Malaspina College straight from high school but dropped out in the second year, filled with self-doubt and greasy hamburgers. While I was there I took part in Oh What a Lovely War, a World War I musical. It was a sprawling ensemble piece and I got to play seven parts, ranging from a Belgian general wearing an extremely tall and silly hat to a Scottish gillie to a soldier singing “Silent Night” in German during a lull in the fighting. I also made a duck from a rubber chicken to use during a hunting bit. Pamphlets were handed out onstage during a town square scene where Emily Pankhurst, a political activist, protests the war. The pamphlets were all handmade and had authentic anti-war slogans on them, except for one which read: “What did you do in The Great War, Daddy?” “I died from eating a McRib!” You never knew if you would get the McRib pamphlet. The intent was to cause the receiving actor to crack up and fall out of character. Theater is a bit strange that way. The McRib was pretty new at the time. I liked it, proving I had no taste when I was young.

Dopple: Since you’re now in tech support, you obviously decided not to pursue acting as a career.

Me: I last acted in the 1988 Vancouver Fringe Festival. I played a nut who died tragically at the end. It was a fun part but the review in the SFU paper was not kind. It unfavorably compared the play to Happy Days. I did one more play the next year but wrote and co-directed and didn’t act. Oh, I did some roleplay in a course this year where I was apparently very convincing as an indifferent tech support person. I’m not sure how I feel about that.

Dopple: With your dreams of acting left behind, what did you do next?

Me: Went to school, then got jobs. The End.

Dopple: The End?

Me: Well, there’s a few details here and there, but those are the broad strokes.

Dopple: Those strokes aren’t broad, they’re planet-spanning.

Me: I think big.

Dopple: What’s the worst job you ever had?

Me: Making pizzas at Mrs. Vanelli’s. I can’t say why, exactly, but I just really hated making pizzas. It was like making them destroyed the magic of eating them. Pizza was my favorite food.

Dopple: Mmm, pizza.

Me: Exactly. I also found working as a TSR at Shaw to be soul-draining.

Dopple: You were a Terminate and Stay Resident program?

Me: The only people who will get that joke are old and wearing adult diapers. As a Technical Support Representative, I logged into the phones at the start of my shift, took calls all day, then logged out and went home. It was strangely wearying to sit there and just take call after call. I felt like my mind was getting sucked out through the headset. I quit after six months, which is five months and 20 days longer than I lasted making pizzas. There was also a cull of 500 employees while I was there. As you might guess, it doesn’t do a lot for morale or your feelings of job security. The people were nice, though.

Dopple: Any funny stories?

Me: No.

Dopple: What’s the zaniest place you’ve worked at?

Me: I have not worked at any place I would call zany. My first job in Vancouver was working at Expo 86, but it was in a souvenir store and was actually pretty dull. It was comparable to making pizzas, though not as messy. It might have been zany if I was dressed as some kind of Expo mascot but I just wore pants.

Dopple: What career advice would you give today’s youth?

Me: Avoid retail at all costs. And call centers. And especially retail call centers, if they exist.

Dopple: You worked retail and didn’t like it?

Me: Let’s just say yes and multiply that by a thousand. I am not a salesperson. I’m not even much of a people person. This is not a good thing in retail. After my last retail job I vowed never again and I’ve stayed true to my word. I think I would prefer going feral and live off wild berries in the woods to working in retail again. However, I worked at Starbucks many years ago, which may technically be considered more of a service job, and it was not that bad, other than smelling like coffee all the time. I had some good times there. It was still generally terrible, but definitely less terrible.

Dopple: I have a lot more questions but I see it’s getting late again.

Me: Part 4 of 2, then?

Dopple: It’s a date. That reminds me, you totally kiss on the first date.

Me: I do, sometimes. Well, not now because I’m not dating anymore.

Dopple: Do you have colorful dating stories to share?

Me: Perhaps. But as you said, it’s getting late. We need to get some sleep so we can run in the morning.

Dopple: We’ll talk about running, too. And more on writing and a bunch of other stuff.

Me: This is pretty narcissistic, don’t you think?

Dopple: Absolutely. Is that an issue?

Me: Not at all. Just wondering.

Dopple: All right, then. Off we go.

Stay tuned (in as much as one can tune into a blog) for Part 4 of this apparently never-ending interview in which I quiz myself about dating, writing, running and ugly feet.

Oh, and Twitter

I have a Twitter account. While I am a bit befuddled about Facebook, I have absolutely no idea why I would use Twitter. The most posts I made with my account was when I had to use Twitter for Nike tech support. I guess they figure every issue can be described in 140 characters or less. As for solutions, “Did you reboot?” is only 13 (I’m not sure if Twitter counts spaces) so no problem there.

The best uses for Twitter seem to be as a quasi-Facebook with fewer words, an efficient tool for online harassment and as a way to communicate if your country is in the midst of a revolution/war. I can just make short posts on Facebook, online harassment is bad and people should stop it, and my country is currently not experiencing a revolution, unless you count Tim Hortons being sold to an American company.

And yet I will keep my account, because maybe one day there will be a “random Twitter account is awarded a million dollars” contest or something. A million dollars is a lot of money, even in Canadian.

I still don’t understand Facebook

Facebook is really popular. It has over a billion accounts now. Everyone is using it. There are hunter-gatherer tribes posting selfies with the antelope they just killed for dinner. It’s everywhere. It’s unavoidable, like air and the ground.

And I still don’t get it.

This Wired article claims to explain the success: Why Facebook Is Killing It–Even When No One Else Is, but it doesn’t really explain much other than “it sells ads and bought companies with popular chat apps and is now featuring live video.” All that stuff is obviously contributing but for most people–and judging by what I observe on my commute on others’ mobile phones (it’s impossible to avoid, I swear) Facebook is still mainly about the News Feed, where friends and others post whatever they want but usually funny little stories or links or pictures of the antelope they killed for dinner.

Once you have more than a few friends who make more than a few posts the news feed can fill up quickly. You could spend most of your free time just scrolling through it, long before ever getting to the built-in apps, games, live chat and secret Facebook chambers.

But it’s all random stuff. There is no overall theme, no coherence. It’s logical that these things are absent, given that you are looking at what literally amounts to miscellaneous thoughts and commentary from a variety of people with varying tastes and interests. I just wonder what is supposed to compel me to read and perhaps contribute. The contribution thing for most is probably either a genuine desire to share (I saw something funny, other people will find it funny and be happy) or just ego-stroking/narcissism but now with the potential to reach millions instead of just those within earshot.

I don’t have a great urge to share. It’s why I make long rambling posts here and remain unconcerned that very few people will ever see them. Ego-stroking can be fun sometimes but too much puts hair on the palms of your hands.

I just don’t get it.

But dammit, I’m going to try. A co-worker recently added me as a friend and I promised I would post or something. It will all end in tears, I’m sure.

Share and like if you agree.

Saturday Night Fever remake: Should we put on our boogie shoes again?

First, let me clarify that there is no Saturday Night Fever remake, this is just some idle thinking on my part. Apologies if anyone got excited at the thought of seeing a white disco suit on the big screen once more.

Saturday Night Fever is usually considered a classic film (it stands at 88% on Rotten Tomatoes and film critic Gene Siskel declared it his favorite movie ever) and had a lasting cultural impact stretching well beyond its 1977 debut. It helped usher in the era of disco, made John Travolta a superstar and did the same for the Bee Gees. It was a new kind of musical in which music was part of the fabric of the film but where no one suddenly broke out into song. At its core it was a coming of age story in which the young and impudent Tony Manero has to decide whether to break away from his dead-end life in Brooklyn (“Life going nowhere, somebody help me”) for something better in Manhattan.

A lot of people would argue there’s no need to remake the movie. I wouldn’t disagree and am always a bit dismayed when classic, highly-regarded films get remade into inevitably inferior new versions. There are plenty of good but flawed movies that are ripe for improvement via remake but they lack the cachet of a classic and so get passed over.

So if I don’t necessarily want a Saturday Night Fever remake, what am I going on about? I happened to be listening to the soundtrack while on my usual lunch walk (side note: the 8-track version–which I owned, dang it–has a live version of “Jive Talkin'” that blows the doors off the CD/digital studio version of the same song. Why they used a live version on the 8-track I don’t know and probably never will, alas) and it suddenly popped into my head that, given that the film is close to 40 years old it’s perhaps more of a surprise that it hasn’t been remade yet. This led to thinking about how it might be handled if someone greenlit a remake.

Here are the possibilities as I see them:

  • the Psycho approach. In 1998 director Gus Van Sant made a mostly shot-for-shot remake of the 1960 classic Psycho. Many saw this not only as inferior to the original, but a pointless experiment in duplication. Given the film was both a critical and financial flop, I doubt this approach would be considered. Also, Saturday Night Fever is as much of its era and wouldn’t necessarily translate to being modernized as Psycho was (see the last entry below for more).
  • a comedy remake, also known as the 21 Jump Street approach. The TV series was played straight but the movie remake and sequel play it for laughs and it works, mainly because the premise of 21 Jump Street is flexible enough that it can be stretched without breaking. While it’s obviously possible to make a comedic coming of age story, I think it would change the tone of the movie enough that it would come off more as a parody than just a different take. Speaking of…
  • an outright parody. That scene in Airplane! is enough. As are the other million parodies already out there.
  • the keep-it-faithful remake. This would keep everything as faithful to the original as possible–setting it in 1977, making the disco central, keeping the characters and story the same. It wouldn’t be a shot-for-shot remake and the biggest question would probably be whether to re-use the songs or create new ones that sound like they are from 1977. It would be challenging and some might still argue a bit pointless to take this approach. It also might come off as unintentional parody.
  • the keep-it-faithful-except-not-really remake. In this version the story and characters would stay the same but the trappings surrounding them would change. Instead of being set in 1977 and having everyone go to the disco, it would be set in 2016 and everyone would go to…wherever people go now. Since the music is such a fundamental part of the film, weaving throughout both the background and foreground, it might prove tricky keeping the feel of the original while updating the music. There’s a variety of popular genres to pull from–hip hop, electronica and its many variants and offshoots–but could any of them replicate the feel of the disco music of 1977 and serve as the basis for the film’s dance competition? It’s possible and this is probably the best approach to take.

Simon Cowell was apparently interested in a remake back around 2009 but it looks like nothing came of that. In a way it’s too bad because I suspect it might have been entertainingly awful.

I also thought about a possible remake of 1980’s Xanadu, which featured Olivia Newton-John and the music of ELO. Watching any clip from the movie–and I do mean any clip–quickly convinced me that it would be impossible to remake this without lapsing into parody, whether intended or not.

What 30 years of aging does to you

In my case, it greatly improves my appearance. I submit the evidence below.

NOTE: Images may frighten young children. People with heart conditions should use caution.

Exhibit A
Student Identification card, 1980
Age of subject: 16

Pretty. Ugly.
Good god, where to even start?

There are many things wrong with this picture. First, I want to clarify that the off-center right-side is not an artifact of the scanning. The card was printed that way because technology in 1980 still lacked the ability to make straight lines.

Now, as for me, there’s the acne. Unfortunate, but a common part of being a teen for many. My grad photos have the acne airbrushed out, but it wasn’t an option for a mere student ID card.

The weird tilt of the glasses suggest my head is as horribly misaligned as the graphics on the card. This is not true. At the same time I have no good explanation for why the glasses are not sitting straight. The tinted lenses were annoying and I ditched them shortly after this photo was taken. Possibly after seeing this photo, when I finally stopped crying.

The slightly-parted lips show my teeth at their worst, making them look uneven and British. Which they were. I apologize to the British with nice teeth.

The hair. It looks like it is slowly making its way around to devour my face. I compensated for its thinness by growing a lot of it instead. It was a pain to groom so I mostly gave up, as you can see. I graduated high school with enough sense to have somewhat shorter hair than pictured here.

In summation: yech.

Exhibit B
Self-portrait without flash, 2010
Age of subject: 46

selfie without flash
Selfie without flash, 2010

As the caption notes, this picture was taken without a flash on a digital camera, so there’s a bit of noise as a result of my tampering with the brightness and contrast.

Let’s compare and contrast with the student ID photo.

The acne is gone. In exchange I am a 46 year old adult instead of a 16 year old goofball.

No tilt to the glasses because I opted not to wear them for the shot. But they wouldn’t have tilted anyway because by 2010 the Earth’s axis had been corrected or something.

Mouth closed so teeth are a delightful mystery, as intended.

The volume of hair has been reduced by 400%. Some hair has slipped to the chin and upper lip. Ears are proven to exist. The overall effect is pleasing, though the onset of male pattern baldness is plainly visible. To my credit I’m not especially trying to hide it, either.

The bright yellow shirt pops out at you. It’s friendly and inviting. It got me a date.

Overall, then, I went from an ugly duckling at 16 to a full-grown duck starting to lose its feathers, but knowing how to highlight its remaining plumage in a pleasing way. That analogy may suck, but all analogies do.

I generally don’t take good photos but nearly all of my school photos post-puberty are hideous. And that is why I share them, to teach the young kids of today to not be hideous. Wear your glasses straight. Wash with soap. Use a comb.

Apple Watch: Time to improve

A few months ago I decided to get an Apple Watch. I’m not always an early adopter but my partner wanted one and so I jumped in, too.

In the time (ho ho) that I’ve used it, I’ve found it’s a convenience I appreciate but one that is also not necessary. I wouldn’t want to forget to wear it but there’s nothing it does that can’t be replicated by other devices and in some cases, these other devices can perform the same functions better, though not always at a lower cost.

And speaking of cost, Apple recently cut the price of the watch, an unusual move for a company that normally never reduces pricing on products until the next version comes out (rumor has it the second version of the Apple Watch will debut before the end of the year). This underscores how the entire smartwatch market is immature, as Apple is apparently trying to boost sales only a year after the watch debuted.

For reference, I have the space grey 38 mm model with the black sports band. This is about as subtle as the watch gets, looks-wise, and it fits decently on my skinny wrists in a way the 42 mm version wouldn’t. The band and watch are both comfortable to wear all day.

The problems with the watch range from minor to downright existential. Ultimately you ask yourself, what is it for? To tell time? A $10 watch can do that. To allow you to see notifications without pulling out your iPhone? That’s a nice feature but is it really worth hundreds of dollars? What else can it do?

If you are looking for a killer app on the watch, you won’t find it. I don’t have an issue with this–a smartwatch is by design made to do multiple things, so I don’t think it needs to have one must-have function. No one buys a smartphone just to take phone calls, after all–a $40 flip phone can do that (and in some cases can do it better). But if the watch can do a lot of things, can it do them well? How many are genuinely useful vs. gimmicky?

Here’s how I use the watch and how I rank the usefulness of each function:

  • Show the time. It is slightly less convenient that a regular watch for this, as you need to either tap the face or turn your wrist in order for the display to light up. This is to conserve battery life and I suspect it will be an issue for all smartwatches using OLED/LED/LCD displays for some time to come.  Nonetheless, the time is always accurate and unlike a regular watch you can choose from a variety of faces. The one I use also shows temperature, calendar events, alarms, the date and my activity. Tapping any of these takes you to the respective app, saving additional steps in navigation. Showing time is obviously a critical function. Sometimes the wrist gesture doesn’t get detected, which is annoying, but I’m not too bothered by it.
  • Notifications. You can customize these to match your iPhone or set them differently. If you turn everything on you’ll probably have your watch tapping, ringing and dinging constantly for half the day, after which the battery will be dead. I have it set to allow select notifications, some accompanied by a sound or tap, others showing up with the little red dot that says “mysterious notification has arrived.” I quickly got used to notifications on the watch and it is genuinely nice to not have to dig out the phone to check them. This works especially well for less-important notifications because now I just glance at my wrist to see them. They seem less annoying this way.
  • Playing music. Navigating your iPhone music collection with the watch works about as well as you’d expect on such a small screen and lists scroll fast, making it more tolerable. The best way to place music is via Siri and generally this works well, allowing for a truly hands-free experience. Sometimes Siri misunderstands (it interpreted “Play the album ‘Pyramid'” as “Play the album ‘pure mind'”) and sometimes it just flakes out completely, like when I said, “Hey Siri, play the album ‘Time.'” This exact command has worked perfectly before but this one time (ahem) Siri dutifully showed what it had heard on the watch face (which was exactly what I had said) then proceeded to play “Girl U Want” from Devo’s Greatest Hits.
  • Tracking activity. The built-in activity app tracks calories, stand time and exercise, allowing you to customize each. Throughout the day it reminds you to stand or shows you how close you are to a goal–these things can also be customized–and awards achievements when you hit your goals. The app works well and you can check more detailed stats on the iPhone version of the app. I feel like there should be a web version, though, for times when you really want to dig in.
  • Fitness/exercise. I use the fitness app for outdoor walks and runs, both of which will use the built-in heart rate monitor and the phone’s GPS. The results are fairly accurate and as long as you are specific with your commands, launching activities via Siri works well (“Hey Siri, start an 8K outdoor run”). Running offers customization on what you see during the run and taps at set intervals. For me it taps every km and at the end, though I’ve only ever noticed the taps exactly once when on a run, it’s just too subtle to feel when you’re moving faster. After the run, you get a breakdown of time, distance, pace, average BPM, calories burned and splits. The data seems fairly accurate, certainly good enough for me, especially since it is consistent, but I miss having a map of the route. Since the app uses the GPS in the phone, I’m not sure why it doesn’t do this. Still, it’s so convenient to use that my TomTom Runner Cardio has sat neglected for months.
  • Heart rate monitor. I check this occasionally, more for novelty than anything. It’s an essential part of the fitness app, though.
  • Text messaging. This works reasonably well, letting you use canned responses, adding customized ones via the phone or using Siri to dictate text that can be sent as audio (which seems silly) or as text. Again, you can often skip pulling out the phone and there seems to be some intelligence driving the options that come up for replies, suggesting that the watch tries to learn what you respond with most often.
  • Phone. Yes, you too can be Dick Tracy. The phone function works but I only use it by accident. This is one case where you really are better off pulling out the actual phone.
  • Third party apps. I’ve tried a few like Weather Underground’s app, but they often take several seconds to start up. That doesn’t sound like much but on a smartwatch, where you typically interact with the display in very short bursts, a few seconds feels like a very long time. As a result I’ve mostly abandoned third party apps. If I’m representative of other watch users, it doesn’t bode well for the health of the watch’s app ecosystem.

All of the above, save for the last two, I find useful and would miss if they weren’t available. But none are essential. I can’t tell someone that any of these functions are worth a minimum of $400 Canadian.

But worse than that, the watch feels unfinished, less a 1.0 product and more a 0.5 one. Third party apps perform poorly. This just isn’t acceptable. Sometimes the watch will feel sluggish when running the built-in apps. There is a strong sense that it is under-powered.

There are a bunch of ways to interact withe the watch. You can swipe, you can tap, you can “long press” you can force touch (press hard), you can use the digital crown (in multiple ways, not just by rotating it), you can use the other side button. And where and when to use any of these is never particularly clear or intuitive. I like options but it feels like the UI is an unwieldy amalgamation of iPhone conventions fused with new, watch-specific ones. And despite all these ways of controlling what is happening, I think the watch could use another physical button or at least allow re-mapping of the side button (which is dedicated to contacts, except when Apple decries otherwise, like when you long press it to restart the watch). In all, the interface seems muddled.

It also seems fiddly. I have often tapped a button, seen the button highlight to acknowledge the tap, then do nothing. It almost seems like I need to aim my finger at a particular angle on the face to get the tap recognized. Perhaps this is an artifact of me being left-handed but having the watch on my left wrist and thus using my right hand. On the plus side I am in some tiny way probably becoming slightly more ambidextrous. I’ve already mentioned the wrist gesture to check the face occasionally fails to be recognized.

Battery life has been fine for me. It’s supposed to last a day and I can do all the usual stuff, plus track a 10K walk and another 8K of walks without the watch having to slip into power-save mode. It also charges relatively quickly. Still, I’d like to see a minimum goal of having the watch face be able to stay on all the time and still have the battery last a day. I wouldn’t wear the watch at night regardless, so I’m not bothered by not being able to use it as a sleep tracker, but battery life is really at the minimum of where it should be.

In the end the Apple Watch is nice but uncompelling. Despite limitations, it has effectively replaced my running watch (for now, at least) and has allowed me to keep the phone tucked away while still keeping track of things. In fact, the watch means I am much less likely to miss a notification or phone call. But this is very much an unfinished product in a still ill-defined category. I don’t think smartwatches will go away any more than regular watches will, but we are probably another revision or two from an Apple Watch that lives up to the full potential of the format. If you can afford one, especially at the new lower price, and know what you’re getting, I don’t think you’ll experience buyer’s remorse, but you’re not missing out on a brave new world by waiting a little longer, either.

In which I interview myself (Part 2 of 2)

When last we left me, I was promising that the second part of the interview with myself would feature “growing up in Duncan, writing, singing and UFOs.” On we go.

Note: As before, the interviewer (me) has been named Dopple for short.

Dopple: Welcome to the second part of the interview.

Me: Thanks, it’s great to be here on the internet. This new carpeting is very nice.

Dopple: Let’s start with some sports talk.

Me: If you insist.

Dopple: I do. How do you feel about none of the Canadian teams making it into the Stanley Cup Playoffs this year?

Me: I already thanked the Canucks for another year without riots. Overall I am nonplussed. I know in some way I should be at least somewhat outraged but I just don’t care that much. Players and teams themselves move around so much it makes the whole exercise of loyalty kind of silly. Last year a co-worker was pumped over the Blue Jays during their playoff run. I pointed out that only three players on the roster were Canadian citizens. He didn’t seem to like that.

Dopple: Tell me about your singing.

Me: Usually done in the shower or with the headphones on when no one else is at home. I’ve been told that I have a great voice (by a roommate coming home early and listening to me wail away before entering the apartment) and more or less been told to never open my mouth again. Realistically, my voice has a fairly limited range and if I stay within those limits, it’s acceptable. I can do a decent Elvis or Bob Dylan. Bob Dylan is actually a lot of fun to imitate. If I try to imitate someone like Billy Joel or Jeff Lynne (can you tell I’m old?) my vocal cords start aching almost immediately. Trying Geddy Lee would likely result in permanent damage to my singing and speaking abilities.

Dopple: Have you ever sung professionally?

Me: I sang in a few plays. I soloed “Down in the Valley” in grade 11 for “Dark of the Moon.” I even learned to play guitar but really I just learned where to put my fingers on the guitar in order to produce sounds reminiscent of the song “Down in the Valley.” I didn’t know a chord from a strut. I didn’t get paid for any of this, so the answer is no. My only reward were all the accolades I made up in my head.

Dopple: What was it like growing up in Duncan?

Me: The actual city limits, for reasons unclear to me, are very small, so the population has always hovered around 5,000. This makes it fairly tiny by city standards, though with the outlying area it’s actually more like 43,000 (according to Wikipedia). For growing up it was fine. I didn’t get in any fights, I had a bunch of good friends, my family got along relatively well, I did fine in school. I grew up in the 70s and early 80s so it goes without saying I had bad hair. But we all did, so it was a bonding thing. A horribly hideous bonding thing, but one all the same. I remember when our first McDonald’s opened in 1978. It was a major cultural event. If you wanted a Big Mac before then (I didn’t, I had a thing for the Filet-o-fish) you had to drive all the way to Victoria. Two years later we got our first Wendy’s. It was fast food but the way you ordered was completely different than McDonald’s. Someone would come by while you stood in line and took your order down on a pad of paper (because you could customize everything), then you worked your way to the counter to pay and collect your food. It seems very quaint now.

Dopple: That sounds very bucolic but surely there was a dark side to Duncan.

Me: It was more beige than dark. There were bad kids. A lot of people drank too much, including my dad. There were drugs and we had a weird family that lived at the end of the street for awhile and the RCMP would visit semi-regularly. A nine year old kid got run over by a cement truck on the Island Highway a block from my house, prompting the installation of the third traffic light as you pass through the city. Even today there are still only three lights when you drive through on the Island Highway. Also, I’m pretty sure I was kind of addicted to arcade games for awhile. It was mild as addictions go because I didn’t have an endless supply of cash, but I spent enough time in the three arcades (I remember The Saucy Dragon downtown but have forgotten the names of the others) that I got my first full-time job at age 19 working in an arcade. Handing out quarters was not a particularly challenging task so I helped kill the time by writing my first novel, using a pencil and six notebooks. I still have the notebooks today. The novel is bad and unfinished, but I had incredibly neat handwriting, which was actually printing.

Dopple: What do you think of UFOs? Do they exist?

Me: You don’t want to know more about Duncan? I can go on.

Dopple: Maybe later. Unless you have a Duncan UFO story.

Me: In fact, I do. My grandfather–my mom’s dad–owned a Texaco station outside town on the Island Highway (south of town, on the way to Victoria and until 1978, the McDonald’s in Victoria). He and his wife lived in a small home in a large yard behind the station. As I recall, the area around the station was mostly woods and fields of wild grass. One night they heard something outside and when my grandfather went to look he saw a UFO hovering above their house. His response was to get a shotgun and shoot at it. It flew away and as far as I know, never returned. Could you blame it? I guess my grandfather really didn’t like trespassers, regardless of what planet they came from.

Dopple: So you believe in UFOs?

Me: I don’t know what he saw but a UFO is an Unidentified Flying Object and there are thousands of reported cases. I don’t think the question is whether they exist or not–they clearly do–but what are they? Many are just a case of mistaken identity. Some may even be swamp gas. But the number of truly unknown cases is enough to confirm we don’t know everything that’s going on up in the sky. If you ask me if UFOs are extraterrestrials visiting from other galaxies, I would say I don’t know. It seems like a long way to travel to mostly just watch us.

Dopple: What about abductions, cattle mutilations and all that?

Me: Again, I don’t know. I don’t have any cattle. I’ve never been abducted, either, unless you count being made to go shopping with my mom when I really wanted to stay home and play video games.

Dopple: Moving on. Let’s talk about writing.

Me: Okay.

Dopple: You write.

Me: Yes.

Dopple: Don’t be difficult.

Me: You can’t stop me.

Dopple: I think I can.

Me: Fine. Yes, I write. I’ve written since I knew how. That sounds like stating the obvious but what I mean is I’ve written creatively since first learning how to write. My grade three teacher (one of them, actually–I had four because grade three was an experimental “open area” learning experience) read this silly stream of conscious story I wrote and the comment she put down, the only comment from a teacher I can clearly remember, was “Kid, you’re a scream!” It was truly inspiring to me.

Dopple: So you kept writing through school.

Me: Yes. In grade five a bunch of us wrote stories that would be shot with a single black and white camera as “movies”, which seemed incredibly exciting, even futuristic, at the time. The class voted for several and mine was one of the winners because I included vampires. You can never go wrong with vampires. I kept writing short stories and plays and things and that first unfinished novel when I was 19. When I moved to Vancouver I started writing more sporadically and sometimes went years without writing at all. I did keep a journal for a year or so, around 1987. It was mostly filled with sarcasm.

Dopple: Why did the writing become intermittent?

Me: Some people are born to write. Stephen King cranks out books like I crank out CO2. James Patterson writes a new book every two seconds. These people are obsessed, compelled. They can’t stop. I am not like that. I am easily distracted. I don’t get passionate about my writing (or my reading). I read a lot but I don’t try to educate myself, particularly. I keep writing in the passive voice and have to go back and fix it all the time. I write stories that go nowhere and peter out. I put it off. I make excuses. I doubt my ability. The list goes on and on, like a roll of toilet paper that never fully unravels.

Dopple: A colorful metaphor.

Me: I’m full of ’em.

Dopple: Do you still write?

Me: Yes. I made a vow to write every day, mostly on this blog if nowhere else, and I’ve stuck to it reasonably well. It enforces discipline, which is a key thing I’ve always struggled with.

Dopple: How is it going now?

Me: Okay. It could be better but it could be much worse, too, or non-existent. I’ve got a number of projects so I try to rotate between them so I’m always working on something. But it is slow-going. I still struggle with focusing, with putting butt in chair and just doing it, Nike-style.

Dopple: I’d like to know more but it’s getting late. Can we continue this later?

Me: You mean do a Part 3 of 2?

Dopple: Yes, exactly.

Me: It’s a date. But no kissing on the first date.

Dopple: Liar. Like, super liar.

Me: Quiet, you.

Tune in next time in which we find out if I do kiss on first dates, more about writing and other creative pursuits and who knows what else. Probably something dumb.

How about that SpaceX rocket?

Elon Musk’s privately-funded SpaceX made history yesterday by being the first group to successfully land a rocket on a platform out at sea. This is not an easy thing to do (the first four tries failed). In the footage you can see whitecaps, so this was even more challenging than it might have been.

The Verge has a story on this (here). Currently on their front page they have, in fact, 15 stories about SpaceX. Some of these are different angles on the rocket landing (reader discussion, photo galleries and so on) but still…15 stories on the main page. Some sites don’t even have 15 stories total. It seems a little crazy. Maybe this is just the way The Verge rolls, though. I am pretty unhip so it’s quite possible I am out of the (hyper)loop.

The Internet is now just the internet

The Verge has a story on how the Associated Press is no longer going to capitalize the word “Internet” as of June 1st. It made me realize I’ve always capitalized it, probably because everyone else did and it wasn’t one of those “Well, if all of your friends jumped off a cliff, would you?” things where going along with the crowd was stupid or possibly fatal.

But now I too will change with the times and write of the internet as a thing and not a Thing.

I’m not, however, going to search and replace every instance of “Internet” on this blog, because that would be stupid (a pedantic waste of time) or possibly fatal (I’d likely feel like murdering something after doing this since AFAIK there’s no easy, global search and replace function).

The Web is also now just the web. Spider web, web of lies, internet web, all on equal footing now.

But does email still have a hyphen or not? (Turns out the AP removed the hyphen five years ago.)

Thanks again, Canucks!

The Vancouver Canucks are currently in a nine game losing streak, stuck in the basement of their conference and safely out of the playoff picture. Because of this, the city of Vancouver will once more be free from any hockey-related riots.

So thanks, Canucks. I will remember your noble sacrifice when I walk along the streets of the downtown core this summer and there are no overturned cars on fire.

Postapalooza?

In order to meet the minimum of one-post-per-day (on a monthly basis) I need to write twelve more posts after this one by the end of tomorrow.

It’s not inconceivable I could do this.

Could I do it without spamming a lot of one-liner nonsense? Quite possibly.

Could I do it without posting any cat images? Probably.

Could I do it with a dozen sober, substantive messages? Let’s not get crazy here.

Let me start by singing the praises of spring, which truly arrived today with sunny skies and unseasonably warm temperatures. I almost expected delightful cartoon birds to alight on my shoulders while fluffy cartoon bunnies hopped around my feet. I mean while outside. It would be kind of weird if that happened at my cubicle and if I’m going to have weird things happen I’ll take winning the Lotto 6/49 jackpot over the appearance of cartoon animals at my work desk.

Speaking of the 6/49, I actually matched four out of six numbers last week. That sounds impressive until you realize it’s only 66%, which in school is a mediocre grade. I won $43.70. I have not, as a result, taken early retirement.

On that still-not-rich note, here’s to 12 more posts in the next 25.5 hours. That’s less than one post every two hours. Easy peasy.

In which I interview myself (Part 1 of 2)

I find myself sitting at the computer. I am relaxed and at ease after a nice walk out on an early spring afternoon. I’m also a bit stinky because I walk like a hurricane and my deodorant apparently can’t keep up. My interview doppelganger will be called Dopple for short.

Dopple: Introduce yourself to the audience.

Me: I’m Creole Ned, just like it says in the title of this blog.

Dopple: That’s not your real name, though, is it?

Me: No. It’s all explained here.

Dopple: Can you provide a brief summary for people averse to clicking links?

Me: It’s a random name I made up for a gaming lobby back in the early-ish days of the Internet. I don’t have a particular love for creole food, it just seemed like a funny title to go with a nerdy-sounding name like Ned. The combination is also pretty rare. There aren’t a lot of Creole Neds out there.

Dopple: Does that make you feel special?

Me: Not really.

Dopple: Tell me a little about this blog.

Me: I started this blog back in February 2005 because it seemed like an interesting way to collect my thoughts into a journal that could be read by anyone with an Internet connection. In retrospect I’m not sure it was a good idea but fortunately very few people actually read it.

Dopple: Does it bother you that you don’t get many hits or views or whatever they call it when someone looks at your site?

Me: Sometimes it bugs me a little, but the blog has no real focus, so there’s no “hook” to lure people back, like funny pictures, a serialized story or high-quality porn. I mean, 462 posts are about jogging. Jogging is not interesting to read about (though I try to spice things up by swallowing bugs and injuring myself when I run). Do you know how many hits the site got on March 19th? None! There are about five hundred billion people on the Internet and no one came to this site on March 19th, not even by accident. Sometimes it gets a little depressing but the blog gives me a place to write lists, so there’s that.

Dopple: Tell me about lists.

Me: I love lists. I bought all those Book of Lists books when I was a kid. I used to devour the Guinness Book of World Records, which was really just a giant set of lists. Lists are easy and fun, two of my favorite things. However, lists don’t make for good discussion, which is why I don’t like lists on forums.

Dopple: Go on.

Me: Someone starts a thread, “Name your ten favorite movies featuring blimps” and every post is just a list like this:

  • Black Sunday
  • Hindenburg
  • The Island at the Top of the World
  • Around the World in 80 Days

There’s no actual discussion, it’s all just lists. You might get someone disputing Around the World in 80 Days because they used balloons, not blimps, but that’s about it. By the way, The Island at the Top of the World is one of those bonkers early 70s movies that came out of Disney when they didn’t know what the hell they were doing. It’s great. Or at least that’s the way my nine-year old self remembers it.

Dopple: Let’s talk about some of your other favorite things. What’s your favorite color?

Me: I used to say red but I’m partial to pink now, which is really just a lighter version of red. My favorite shade is probably deep pink, which has a solid sturdiness to it.

Dopple: Gay.

Me: Complete coincidence! Besides, assigning colors to gender or sexual orientation is dumb, so I’m doing my bit to help change that.

Dopple: That’s very progressive of you. What’s your favorite food?

Me: Anything with melted cheese on it.

Dopple: So liver with melted cheese?

Me: Yuck, no.

Dopple: So anything you like with melted cheese on it?

Me: Yes please.

Dopple: Who is your favorite author and why?

Me: This sounds lazy because he’s sold a trillion books, but Stephen King. Why? Because he writes so effortlessly. Even his bad stuff just rolls along. He doesn’t put up barriers, he invites the reader along for a ride. It may be a trip in a sedan along a quiet country road, it may be on a roller coaster that threatens to fly off the tracks on every corner. His characters breathe and feel real. He’s even managed a few good endings. I’ve almost forgiven him for It. Almost. But I also like a certain level of absurdity because in many ways I think life is absurd, and for that I find Douglas Adams scratched that itch. Then he died. David Wong (Jason Pargin) is pretty good at capturing an Americanized take on that absurdity, though.

Dopple: Do you read a lot?

Me: I’m not a fast reader but with my longish commute I manage around 32-36 books a year. I mostly read trash.

Dopple: Why do you read trash?

Me: Because I want, above all else, to be entertained. I’m not averse to learning about the human condition, man’s inhumanity to man and all that, but wrap it up in something that’s enjoyable to plow through. Plus I have always had a fondness for things like Bigfoot, UFOs, conspiracy theories and so on.

Dopple: Do you believe in all that nutty stuff?

Me: No. The conspiracy theory stuff, in particular, fascinates me because it shows how otherwise sane people can be led to believe ridiculous things. Look up “chemtrails” or “jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams.” I’ll wait here.

Dopple: I’ll look them up later. What about Bigfoot?

Me: I think Bigfoot or something like it could be real. Woods are scary. And then there’s the ocean. We hardly know what’s going on way down there at points that are deeper than Mt. Everest is high. Sure, maybe it’s just a bunch of blind glow-in-the-dark shrimp, but it could also be The Great Old Ones biding their time before wiping us out, for all we know.

Dopple: Let’s shift gears a bit. Tell me about your hobbies.

Me: I like to draw. Well, I used to.

Dopple: Why did you stop?

Me: I’m not very good at it.

Dopple: Practice makes perfect!

Me: Lazy.

Dopple: I know you have a Wacom tablet…

Me: It’s gathering dust. I mean that literally. I found it the other day while looking for something. Caked with dust. This place is very dusty.

Dopple: You used to draw a lot as a kid.

Me: Yes, I did a lot of drawing through my teens and twenties. I made comics like The Ever Continuing Saga of the Round Balls, Bablee Duck, Angry Carrot and so on. I started scrawling with pencil crayons and ballpoint pens (tip: not the best tool for drawing), then moved to a Koalapad on a Commodore 64 and eventually a Wacom Bamboo tablet on PC. The tablets always felt awkward, like I was drawing by remote control. I can see why tablets with built-in screens like the Cintiq are popular with artists, even if most artists can’t actually afford them.

Dopple: You see the iPad Pro and it tempts you, doesn’t it?

Me: Maybe. Yes. Yes, it does. But I’m looking at something like $1500 to doodle for half an hour and then give up forever. It’s not a good investment. And I already have a Surface Pro 3 with pen. I’ve tried doodling on that and it didn’t take.

Dopple: But the iPad Pro is so much sexier…

Me: I’m not listening! This interview is over!

Dopple: Aw, come on, just a few more questions. We haven’t even talked about your writing or sexual preferences.

Me: Ho ho.

Dopple: So tell me about–

Me: Two more questions. Then I have to do something important, like check my garrison in World of Warcraft.

Dopple: That doesn’t sound important.

Me: Don’t judge me.

Dopple: Can we continue this interview later, then?

Me: I will permit that, yes.

Dopple: Very generous of you.

Me: I’m a generous guy, as you know.

Dopple: What’s the most private thing you’re willing to admit?

Me: Isn’t that a profile question from OK Cupid?

Dopple: Yes.

Me: It’s a dumb question.

Dopple: Indulge me.

Me: I wear socks when having sex.

Dopple: Ew.

Me: You asked.

Dopple: All the time?

Me: Is that the second question?

Dopple: No. How about this: Is the Apple Watch worth it?

Me: Not really. But I would hate to forget to put it on.

Dopple: How seemingly contradictory!

Me: That’s my motto.

That’s all we have time for today. Check out the second part of the interview where we learn more about growing up in Duncan, writing, singing and UFOs.