Book review: Little Heaven

Little HeavenLittle Heaven by Nick Cutter
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Little Heaven pays homage to both early Stephen King and low-budget gorefest movies of the 70s and early 80s. Rather than turn the “camera” away from a gruesome attack, pseudonymous author Nick Cutter zooms in to capture every detail. At times it seems like every other person, creature, and object in the story is “pissing blood.”

Shifting between 1966 and 1980 (the present day for the novel as written), Little Heaven tells the story of a self-styled Jim Jones who follows a voice from San Francisco into the wilderness of New Mexico to construct a religious compound where he and his followers live simple, God-fearing lives.

Except for all the monsters lurking in the woods, most of which seem to be amalgamations of various woodland creatures squashed together into multilegged, multi-headed horrors, all the better to bite, tear and create incidents of pissing blood.

In the 1966 portion, which comprises the bulk of the novel, a woman whose nephew is part of the commune hires three mercenaries/assassins to check out Little Heaven and see if the boy is okay. The three are broadly-drawn, one a black Englishman who all but “pip pip Cheerio’s” his way through the story, a feisty young woman with a sharp tongue and Roland DesChain from The Dark Tower. Whoops, I mean Micah Shugrue. A few of his rougher edges get sanded down in the 1980 part but the language and mannerisms of the character straddle a fine line between homage and rip-off. I didn’t mind that much since Roland is a terrific character to emulate, and his cadence and speech is perfect for a stoic and eminently practical sort of person.

This is old-fashioned horror through and through. The bad guys are very bad, the horrors are nigh-insanity inducing and have no small appetite for removing limbs from anyone they can catch up to, but while there are hints and suggestions, there’s ultimately no real explanation for why they exist and where they are from. They just are. I again didn’t mind this because it’s better than Cutter’s approach to the end of his novel The Deep, which overexplained to the point of undercutting much of the preceding story.

I was least fond of the 1980 section and here’s why: if you remove it in its entirety, the 1966 part still tells a complete story. The 1980 events implausibly set up a “noble sacrifice” but it’s so superfluous to the overall story that it has no emotional resonance.

The whole thing also felt longer than necessary, the equivalent of one of those low-budget gorefests running three hours. Cutting the 1980 segment would make the story tighter and, I think, better.

This is my least-favorite of the three Cutter novels I’ve read (the others being The Troop and aforementioned The Deep) but it’s still a decent read. For someone craving old school horror it may do the trick.

View all my reviews

Book review: Steve Jobs

Steve JobsSteve Jobs by Walter Isaacson
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

What would Steve Jobs think of me waiting over five years to read his biography, patiently waiting for it to go on sale? Judging from what author Walter Isaacson writes, Jobs would probably yell at me, call me a bozo, cry and then the next day tell me how smart I was for waiting.

Or something like that.

Switching back and forth between his career at Apple (and Pixar and–briefly–at NeXT) and his personal life, Isaacson uses quotes from Jobs’ family, friends and workers, along with a generous supply of quotes from Jobs himself gathered from numerous interviews to assemble a portrait of a driven, intense man who apparently had none of the inhibitions or controls that keep most people at least relatively polite. Jobs would hurl insults and blast designs, products and people alike when he saw them as lacking. He analyzed others with an unsympathetic eye and then used his relentless verbal assaults to demand what he wanted–and often got great results.

But not always.

The quest for perfect design and end-to-end control of products led him and Apple to create amazing and well-crafted consumer devices–the Macintosh, the iPod, the iPad and the iPhone. But the same forces that drove him to be so demanding also blinded him to stick with designs that didn’t work (hello, original iMac mouse), to be needlessly cruel to employees and create distance with members of his own family.

He indulged in offbeat diets–long fasts, periods of eating just a single type of fruit, while also eschewing personal hygiene, believing that the diets would keep his body clean and pure. How he could not detect his own body odor after not showering for weeks at a time is perhaps an example of the “reality distortion field” he projected, even on himself.

It was his devotion to odd diets and alternative medicine that delayed proper treatment on his cancer for nine long months and ultimately contributed to his death at 56.

Isaacson portrays Jobs as a genius but also an immensely flawed person, often correcting assertions Jobs makes in the interviews spread throughout the book. In the end, I was left with a picture of Jobs as someone who had an excellent eye for design, an almost insane drive for perfection and both the charisma and chutzpah to woo and wallop people as he saw fit (and he often wooed and walloped the same person, sometimes on the same day). Any admiration you might have is tempered by his often odious personality.

One disappointment with the biography is how it ends. There is a coda that lets Jobs speak about his legacy in his own words and a list of his achievements but, perhaps because the book was rushed to press shortly after his death, there is little that touches on his final days or the events and reactions following his death. In that sense, the biography feels a bit incomplete.

Still, this lengthy examination of Jobs’ life presents a vivid portrait of a distinct personality and how that personality forged one company into a massive success by fully engaging on his strengths. Some at Apple–notably Tim Cook–claim that the treatment of Jobs here is unfair and inaccurate and there is a sense that a certain amount of cherry-picking to highlight the narrative is taking place, but at the same time it’s clear that Isaacson is on the mark on all the major aspects of Jobs.

Recommended.

View all my reviews

Book review: Dark Matter

Dark MatterDark Matter by Blake Crouch
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I am a sucker for multiverse stories.

And so are the other countless millions of versions of me. If they exist.
Dark Matter is at heart a simple story, about a man–in this case atomic scientist Jason Dessen–who reaches a crossroads in his life and has to choose between a great career or a great family. He chooses the family and 15 years later seems pretty content with the choice.

Then he gets abducted while returning from a pub one night and things start getting weird. He is injected with some kind of drug and wakes up in a lab he has no memory of, surrounded by people who say he has been gone for 14 months. He has accomplished fantastic things he can’t recall. He wonders if he is losing his mind.

From this starting point, Dark Matter merrily takes the reader on a breakneck journey across parallel worlds, some seemingly utopian, others the stuff of nightmares, as Dessen struggles to figure out what has happened to him and tries to reconnect with his wife and son.

The story effortlessly switches gears from intimate to weird and back again and although the mystery is naturally peeled away as the plot drives forward, author Blake Crouch keeps interest high by constantly ratcheting up the tension over what will happen next. With a multitude of worlds, the possibilities are literally endless.

I particularly like the exploration of the concept that once you choose a certain path, it can shape and change you in profound ways, not just in what you do or become, but fundamentally altering the person you are and the identity you assume.

There are car chases, too.

Some might balk a bit at Crouch’s prose–he is nearly channeling Hemingway here, with short, staccato sentences and single line paragraphs. But the economy of words emerges as a strength, sort of the equivalent of a well-made sketch that allows the viewer to easily fill in details.

As I said, I am a sucker for multiverse stories and Dark Matters scratched the itch for me in fine style. If you are at all interested in parallel universe fiction, Dark Matter is an easy recommendation.

View all my reviews

Book review: Monster Maelstrom: A Flash Fiction Halloween Anthology

Monster Maelstrom: A Flash Fiction Halloween Anthology (Flash Flood #2)Monster Maelstrom: A Flash Fiction Halloween Anthology by George Donnelly
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This is the second Flash Flood anthology, focusing on Halloween/horror-themed stories.

I found this collection of stories a little more uneven than the first collection (Bite-Sized Stories: A Multi-Genre Flash Fiction Anthology (Flash Flood Book 1) but the price (free) and commitment (minimal, given the whole idea is to present short-short stories that can be read in a few minutes, I can still give this a solid thumbs-up for the standout stories.

It’s not easy to pull off a fully self-contained story in so few words so when it comes together it almost feels like a little alchemy is involved.

On the negative side, the collection starts off weak, with a flat zombie story set against the backdrop of a strip bar. There are also enough stories from the first person POV where that person ends up being dead by the end that I’m wondering if this is some new trend in fiction. If so, it should be stopped immediately because it is lazy, cheating storytelling, the equivalent of those hokey twist endings on The Twilight Zone that we laugh about now.

On a more positive note, there are some nicely rendered stories here, including:

– “Teddy Bear Defenders” (Tom Germann). A cute story with a (horror-tinged) Toy Story vibe.
– “What I did at Halloween” (Edward M. Grant). A little girl thwarts a would-be robber with Bob. Bob is Bad. But this story is good. The ending seemed a little too on-point but doesn’t diminish the amusing interplay between the characters prior to it.
– “Monsters Like Us” (Jeanette Raleigh). An atmospheric take that initially feels like it might be yet another vampire story but turns into something more interesting–and chilling.
– “In the Eye of the Beholder” (Bill Hiatt). This *is* a vampire story, in a manner of speaking, and though the twist might be obvious to some, it is nicely executed (no pun intended–mostly).

There are other stories worth checking out but really, just grab the collection and have a look. The stories that don’t work breeze by so quickly it’s akin to dabbing something sour on your tongue before moving onto something sweet.

Overall, I can recommended this anthology for both horror fans and anyone looking for new writers to discover.

View all my reviews

 Book review: Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions

Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our DecisionsPredictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions by Dan Ariely
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Dan Ariely is an academic who writes in a very accessible manner, drawing on anecdotes and personal experience to flesh out the numerous case studies he has conducted in his pursuit of trying to explain why people often engage in irrational–yet predictable–behavior. Although some of the humor misfires a bit when he assumes the reader is at the same station of life he is for maximum effect (straight white male) it’s never ill-intended so I was able to roll with it.

Ariely’s methodology is not to simply analyze the case studies of others but to conduct numerous experiments of his own, using people drawn from the public (both willingly and sometimes more covertly), particularly university students. In these experiments, he demonstrates the principles that drive us to make decisions, ranging from what people order in a restaurant or bar based on what others order first, to how enticing free money (with no strings attached) is to an increasingly distrustful public. He also covers the placebo effect and other behaviors that have no apparent rational basis.

In doing so he draws some conclusions on how we can be better aware of the circumstances that trigger irrational responses so we can better control how we react and offers a warning that collectively we may be teetering toward a level of mistrust with institutions that may be very difficult to restore, the downside of which will be more division, cheating and indifference to the welfare of others as we look out for ourselves.

Although some of the possible conclusions are bleak (and may seem more plausible now in 2017 than when the book was originally published in 2009), Ariely retains a hopeful tone throughout. He clearly loves his work and has great fun in trying to puzzle out what makes people act the way they do. This comes through abundantly in Predictably Irrational, making the book an easy recommendation for those looking to gather some food for thought on behavioral economics and the morality and rationality of people in western culture.

View all my reviews

Book review: Finders Keepers

Finders Keepers (Bill Hodges Trilogy, #2)Finders Keepers by Stephen King
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Perhaps you have heard of Stephen King. He’s had a few books published.

Finders Keepers is the second book in his Bill Hodges trilogy, a thriller in which a high school senior unwittingly faces off against a quite-mad man freshly released after a long sting in prison.

Hodges doesn’t actually appear until about a quarter of the way into the story. Instead the reader is taken back to 1978 where a young Irish man with unusually red lips leads a home invasion of a reclusive author, making off with a load of cash and a collection of notebooks containing work the author has been writing since his alleged retirement years earlier. The young man, Morris Bellamy, is a fan and as King himself once pointed out, fan is short for fanatic and Bellamy is very much a fanatic about the characters the author John Rothstein has created, to the point where he perhaps finds them more real than, well, real people.

When the story jumps forward to the present, Bellamy is just being released from prison, having served 30+ years for a rape conviction. He has spent his incarceration patiently waiting for his release, knowing the stash of loot form Rothstein’s home–cash, but more importantly, dozens of notebooks filled with writing the author has worked on since his alleged retirement–is safely stored in a trunk buried in the woods near his old house. Unfortunately for Bellamy, Peter Saubers, the aforementioned high school senior, has discovered the trunk, used the money to help his family and taken the notebooks, planning to sell them.

The remainder of the story is a series of unfortunate events for Saubers, as Bellamy closes in on the teen, willing to do anything it takes to get back the notebooks he sees as rightfully his. Hodges, along with Holly and Jerome from Mr. Mercedes, enter into the story to aid Saubers before it’s too late.

King effortlessly ratchets up the tension after spending a good while drawing the reader in and while characters sometimes connect the dots a little too easily (I wish I was half as good at making connections as these people), he never cheats. There is no sleight of hand here, just expert play with the cards that have been dealt.

King also sets up the third and final book of the trilogy by having Hodges make regular visits to the hospital where Brady Hartsfield, the Mr. Mercedes killer of the first novel, now resides. It seems that Brady may not be quite as incapacitated as his brain trauma would suggest. Here King broadly hints at more familiar territory, suggesting abilities that go beyond the merely normal.

While the book ends with a set-up for the final volume, the story of Finders Keepers is self-contained and can be enjoyed without having read Mr. Mercedes. It’s a terrific tale of suspense filled with characters that King brings alive with his usual expertise.

Recommended.

View all my reviews

Book review: This Year You Write Your Novel

This Year You Write Your NovelThis Year You Write Your Novel by Walter Mosley
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This is a brief but solid overview on the basics of putting together a first novel. Mosley doesn’t go into great detail, he just lays down some rules, some less-strict guidelines, offers suggestions, often gives the writer the thumbs-up to do something however best it works for him and really, really believes in the idea of rewriting.

His advice comes down to a few essentials, most of which will be familiar to anyone who has read any how-to’s on writing:

  •  set up a daily routine:
    • write every day (no exceptions)
    • devote 90 minutes per day to writing (this can include editing or reading drafts)
    • target daily output of 600-1200 words
  •  show, don’t tell
  • characters should grow and transform, not remain static
  • write without restraint
  • take about three months for the first draft
  • take a week to read the first draft (this counts as the second draft)
  • read and if possible, record the entire novel in your own voice to hear how it sounds
  • focus on every sentence in rewrites. Every sentence!
  • writers write too much. Edit without mercy.
  • don’t write things you aren’t sure of; do follow-up research after the first draft as needed
  • you can write from a first person, third person or omniscient perspective; third person is recommended for first-time novelists
  • you never mention second person perspective because it’s weird and makes you look funny
  • to find an agent, write to the publisher of a book whose style you like and get the agent’s info; send a query letter and vitae to the agent
  • don’t ever take an agent that demands to be paid directly

And that’s pretty much it. Mosley provides examples of plot, sentence structure and other part of a novel, and the whole thing can be digested in a single sitting if you’re so inclined–all the better to get started on that great novel lurking within.

I can’t really quibble with any of the suggestions, though ninety minutes per day may be tough to manage for a lot of people. But where’s the fun if you’re not suffering for your art?

Given the endless tide of writing advice on the internet, a book like this is probably going to be a tough sell, especially at full price. On sale, it’s a tidy little volume that says what it wants to say simply and clearly. A first-time novelist will find value here, but more experienced (if unpublished) writers may find most of the lessons to be familiar.

View all my reviews

Book review: Future Visions: Original Science Fiction Inspired by Microsoft

Future Visions: Original Science Fiction Inspired by MicrosoftFuture Visions: Original Science Fiction Inspired by Microsoft by Elizabeth Bear
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Despite its title, Future Visions: Original Science Fiction Inspired by Microsoft is mercifully not about people making the world a better place with their Xboxes, Windows 10 and the HoloLens.

Instead it’s a collection of stories about future tech that sometimes hints at Microsoft products without naming them–such as the augmented reality glasses used in the graphic novel story “A Cop’s Eye” that could be the follow-up to the HoloLens, to various extrapolations on AI. We’ve come a long way since Clippy. The stories shift in tone from playful (the Dr. Doolittle-inspired “Hello, Hello”) to weird (Greg Bear’s mind-bending take on what happens when a quantum computer starts to successfully do its job in “The Machine Starts”) but never veers entirely toward the dark. These visions are sometimes tales of caution, such as Ann Leckie’s take on culture clash and mistranslation in “Another Word for World” but there is usually some hint of hope or redemption, no matter how bleak the situation may seem.

This book is available as a free download from major ebook retailers so the only investment made here is with your time. Given the brevity of the collection and the generally high quality of the work (none of the writers have phoned it in–perhaps why there’s no Lumia product placement) it’s an easy recommendation.

View all my reviews

Book review: A Head Full of Ghosts

A Head Full of GhostsA Head Full of Ghosts by Paul Tremblay
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

A Head Full of Ghosts could be described glibly as “The Exorcist meets Discovery Channel Reality TV show” but that sells it short.

The story of a 14 year old girl who may be possessed by a demon or may just be suffering from mental illness, is told from the perspective of her younger sister, eight at the time and 23 in the present day. There are three threads that Meredith “Merry” Barrett presents to the reader. One is a straight re-telling of the events that happened to her family in 2001, another is as analysis of the Discovery show “The Possession” presented in a blog under a pseudonym, and the third is Merry sharing her story with a writer putting together a book on the events.

Tremblay does a terrific job in capturing the essence of the eight year old Merry, a smart girl still prone to the flights of fancy that seem perfectly natural in the mind of a child. The slow unraveling of her parents and sister is both sad and horrifying to witness.

The relationship between the sisters forms the core of the story and it is by turns touching, funny and freaky. Marjorie, the older sister, initially appears whimsical, but that whimsy turns macabre as she comes apart. When the Discovery crew arrives to record the family’s activities, hoping (and to an extent trying to manufacture) some really weird stuff, the story eases up and lets the reader breathe easy for a bit. Then it turns even darker as the father brings in a priest (and yes, another, younger priest–Trembay openly pays homage to almost every possession-themed movie out there) and everything turns toward an inevitable exorcism.

The thing I enjoyed most about A Head Full of Ghosts is the way it constantly challenges the reader to determine what is real, what is fake, what’s being done for show and what’s being done because people no longer have control. It’s not an especially scary book–though there are scares to be had–but it is disturbing. Conversely, the deconstruction of familiar horror tropes is to the point and often quite funny. Somehow Tremblay makes the two work together.

Recommended.

View all my reviews

Book review: Bite-Sized Stories

Bite-Sized Stories: A Multi-Genre Flash Fiction Anthology (Flash Flood Book 1)Bite-Sized Stories: A Multi-Genre Flash Fiction Anthology by George Donnelly
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I was turned onto this collection by one of the contributors, a fellow forum poster and author of a published novel (so one more than me!) This is a free collection and can be found at all major ebook sites. The idea behind it is simple–offer a bunch of very short (3-4 page) stories from a raft of authors to allow the reader to quickly sample their styles. The hope is the reader will enjoy at least some of what they read and seek out more work from the same authors.

It’s a good idea and, I think, a successful one. The stories cover a range of genres so there’s bound to be something to interest any reader (though romance and literary only have a single entry each) and each story is short enough that there is minimal investment. Even if a story outright stinks (and none in this collection do) it’s only a few minutes of reading before you move on.

At the same time it’s difficult to pull out highlights because a lot of the stories trade on twist endings, are more sketches than stories, or skip nuance because there’s only four freaking pages to say everything. And the horror section in particular is a bit disappointing in being so zombie-heavy. At least it’s not wall-to-wall vampires.

But there is a lot of entertaining stuff here and I will indeed be seeking out work by some of the authors.

The collection is free, it’s a quick read and it’s a handy introduction to a lot of indie authors worthy of your time. Recommended.

View all my reviews

Book review: Lovecraft’s Monsters

Lovecraft's MonstersLovecraft’s Monsters by Ellen Datlow
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

If you want a collection of stories where more than a few people have “that Innsmouth look,” then Lovecraft’s Monsters will leave you happy as a shoggoth.

Most of the stories are as weird or horrifying as you’d expect, as the various authors draw on Lovecraft’s pantheon on Old Ones, Great Ones, Elder Gods and more, but a few are lighter in tone, most notably Neil Gaiman’s opener, a tale of a werewolf in Innsmouth, with a healthy (?) mix of arcane rituals, fish people and time-to-change-into-a-hairy-eating-machine thrown in.

One of my favorites is “The Same Deep Waters as You” which tells of an animal behavior specialist conscripted by the U.S. government to go to an island off the coast of Washington state in order to communicate with people (?) who have been held there since 1928, people with “that Innsmouth look.” It takes one of the established and best-known parts of Lovecraft’s lore–the fishy doings in and around Innsmouth–and tackles it as a scientific problem (that also worries the military). I felt the end, which takes a turn more into straight-up Lovecraft weirdness, was a bit of a letdown but the story as a whole remains strong.

Laird Barron’s “Bulldozer” features the usual rumpled pile of machismo protagonist with the heart of a poet. When he’s not ladling on metaphors, he’s swinging his fists or firing his pistol. Barron also continues to be a big believer in eschewing the whole “you can’t tell the story from first person POV if the character ends up dead/rendered unable to communicate to the reader because of various non-Euclidean horrors.” The story actually picks up steam as it progresses, so the excesses end up not feeling as excessive.

There’s a bunch of other stories here and most of them are worth a read. There’s even a few poems if you’ve ever wanted to see someone try to rhyme something with “Cthulhu.” (I’m kidding, no one does that, though I wish they had.) Overall there’s 21 stories and poems, enough to sate the appetite of any Lovecraft fan looking for stories drawn from the mythos he created, but pruned of the purple prose and occasional racism.

On a scale of five star-tipped tentacles, Lovecraft’s monsters rates four out of five tentacles.

View all my reviews

Book review: Day by Day Armageddon

Day by Day Armageddon (Day by Day Armageddon,#1)Day by Day Armageddon by J.L. Bourne
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

As a series of website updates that present the daily journal of a soldier surviving a zombie apocalypse, Day by Day Armageddon works fairly well. Collected into a novel it feels a little creaky but fans of zombie apocalypse fiction (you may have noticed a few* books of this type have been released over the last few years) will likely enjoy this particular take on what happens when the dead don’t stay dead.

True to its name, the story is told through journal entries, covering the first five months of a zombie outbreak that devastates the world, forcing survivors to navigate hordes of shambling, mindless people. Wait, that’s the mall during Black Friday (ho ho). Supplementing the journal entries are maps, letters and other bits typical of an epistolary novel.

The story doesn’t follow a traditional narrative, given its unique structure, though Bourne does ramp up the action/tension from time to time by placing his protagonist and others in especially perilous situations. And while the story does build toward a showdown of sorts, it ends abruptly, with an author’s note promising there will be more in the form of sequels. Not surprisingly, there are sequels. A reader looking for a strictly self-contained story may be disappointed by the ending.

The prose is workmanlike, as befits journal entries, but at times I wished the protagonist was a struggling writer rather than a soldier. Sure, he wouldn’t know which way to hold an assault rifle (a handy zombie survival skill) but he would not how to wax poetic about the existential dread of facing each morning not knowing if you’d make it through to the end of the day. Plus there’d be comic relief when he tried using an assault rifle.

The ebook edition has a fair number of spelling errors in it, but I’m still not sure if they are actual editorial slips or if Bourne was trying to portray his protagonist as being as fallible as most when it comes to the difference between “to” and “too.” The repeated use of “lightening” over “lightning” grated, though.

The women in the story seem to mainly serve as props, with Bourne referring to them as “the females” and of course they don’t know how to handle guns (not to worry, the protagonist teaches them). At least there is no requisite romance, though the possibility is hinted at (“I am a man, after all,” as the protagonist puts it).

Overall, this was a quick and effortless read. Given the day-by-day approach, Bourne does a good job in keeping things moving along, but the whole presentation feels a bit slight. This isn’t a knock, exactly, because I think Bourne did about what you would expect given the parameters he set out for himself.

And it’s still better than The Rising.

View all my reviews