The Post-Truth world is cramping my (writing) style

What a strange and terrible month November has been. It feels like huge things have gone horribly wrong and a bunch of the little things have fallen apart, too. After the first six days it has been a struggle to write anything–my NaNo novel, this blog, thoughts on a napkin, anything. I feel not just uninspired but kind of depressed. Not in the clinical sense, just blah and unmotivated, a pervading sense of “Meh, what does it matter, the world sucks” overriding everything. And it does. The world is full of stupid, ignorant people. I have long suspected this but as the years passed and I grew older and gained more experience and perspective, I shed my cynicism and chose to believe that people are fundamentally good, that they are decent and do the right thing (most of the time).

I no longer believe this.

People are fickle, prone to acting on often irrational emotion, are easily swayed to act against their own interests and are generally not interested in logic, rationality or anything that might disrupt their world view, however absurd or unrealistic it might be. It is the veneer of civilization (which is going to be sorely tested in the next decade or two) that holds everything together, but that veneer is thin and, I think, on the verge of peeling away, with dire consequences.

If you think we are removed from our savage, primitive past, consider what has happened in the last century, the wars, the acts of terrorism, the millions upon millions of people killed. And what were they killed for? Not believing the right ideas. Living on the wrong chunk of land. Nonsense. We fight and kill over nothing worthwhile because we can do no better.

We see people like Trump elected president–an ignorant, bullying, racist, sexist and entirely unfit individual for the office–because we can do no better.

The best we can hope for is that our species somehow survives itself long enough to evolve well past where we are now. Climate change–and remember, Americans just elected a man who thinks it’s a hoax–will force us to face reality, not the preferred bubble so many prefer to see as reality, but the actual, horrible truth.

But we won’t pull together, we will tear apart. We will devolve to our worst selves, incapable of adapting to the massive changes to come. We will do this because we prefer ignorance to reality, because in the end we’d rather help ourselves than help others.

I wish I didn’t believe this because it means the only thing that makes sense to write any more is post-apocalyptic dystopian fiction. And while I love a good post-apocalyptic dystopian story, I’d prefer to write whimsical, funny things, stuff that is slight but entertaining in its own way. But it’s been challenging this month. The news is just so relentlessly awful (the real news–the fake news is even worse).

But if the choice is to despair or hold onto hope, however slim, I have to go for the latter. Who knows, maybe there really is some benevolent alien race waiting to swoop in and harvest save us. Or we’ll figure out cold fusion and lick global warming at the same time. Or a comet will sweep past Earth and the dust in its tail will boost everyone’s intelligence exponentially. “You’re playing 3D chess again? The challenge only starts when you move to 4D chess.”

And flying cars for everyone.

I conclude with two promises to myself: the first is to write something every day. On this blog, in a story, on a napkin. But somewhere. And every day. The second is to retain that thin hope, to stave off pessimism.

Okay, one more: no farmer’s tan next summer.

The Post-Truth world

I saw a phrase used the other day that neatly explains so much of the recent election of Donald Trump as US president (typing that out still feels like indulging in the worst sort of fan fiction).

It’s just two words: post truth. You could hyphenate it or capitalize it or both to make it look more official:

Post-Truth

It is a simple concept. Trump ran on a campaign built on fear, hate and unworkable, impractical promises. He would bring back manufacturing. He would revive the coal industry. He would force Apple to make their computers in America. He’d build a wall along the border and make Mexico pay for it. Muslims would be essentially banned from entering the country until he could “figure out what was going on.”And nearly 50 million believed enough of these promises/threats to see him elected.

The reality will be much different, of course. But it doesn’t matter because we are now living in the era of Post-Truth. Objective facts, reality itself–these things no longer matter to a large swath (or swatch, if you prefer) of the population. And this is not just a US-specific phenomena, it has just manifested most spectacularly there, with chilling results for the world at large.

Simply put, a lot of people do not care about reality anymore. They don’t care about facts or science. Reason and logic are meaningless. These people have retreated into the safety of the world as they perceive it, as they want it to be. These people are essentially unreachable through conventional means, whether you are seeking their vote or simply asking them to listen objectively to what you have to say.

They will not listen unless they hear what they want to hear.

The danger is a demagogue–like Trump–can manipulate these people and acquire power by telling them what they want to hear, then use that power to do terrible things. And when re-election comes, the people like Trump will deflect and again tell people what they want to hear. “It’s not my fault, I want these great things for you, but the system is against me.” And he will retain their support.

I don’t see an easy way to get past Post-Truth. Maybe everything must collapse before it can be rebuilt.

Climate change may very well provide the key to that.

So as people elect demagogues who placate them by telling them foolish lies they want to believe, the Earth undergoes dramatic transformation as the climate goes through significant warming. Millions, maybe even billions, will die as we collectively do too little and do it too late to help ameliorate the worst of the effects. It sounds like indulging in the worst sort of fan fiction again, but it could happen. All evidence points to it already having begun.

Well, that was depressing. At least we’ll have funny cats on the internet until it all comes crashing down. Promise us you won’t take away the kittens, Mr. Trump.

WTF America

I would never discuss politics on Facebook.

I shouldn’t say never, actually. Probably never is more accurate. I might do it by accident or during a momentary lapse in judgment.

Why would I never discuss politics on Facebook? Because it’s like rolling over a big rock and discovering all the yucky bugs underneath, except the bugs are your FB pals and you never before realized they had political views you find daffy, baffling or downright infuriating. You wished you’d have just left that big rock alone.

But here on my blog I have my own peaceful little echo chamber. I almost never disagree with myself. Every big rock I roll over has  nothing more than rich, nutrient-filled earth under it, the stuff life happily springs from.

When I post on my blog I don’t have to face disappointment from yucky bugs or be tempted into fruitless arguments with people who I had previously found to be nice or sane.

Today’s topic is the U.S. election held on November 8, 2016. That was four days ago. American voters did a silly thing–they elected Donald Trump to be their next president. Just when I was ready to forgive them re-electing George W. Bush after they re-elected Obama, they go and do this.

Trump is a narcissistic bully, thin-skinned, sexist, racist, xenophobic and ignorant on basic facts about the world and his own country. He ran on a campaign of fear and hate, filled with ideas that were vague or terrible or unworkable or all of these things. He acted like a vulgar clown. He demonstrated over the course of a typically drawn-out campaign that he was singularly unfit for the office of the president. And yet he beat out 16 other Republicans to win their nomination. He beat Hillary Clinton (though not in the popular vote) and won it all.

The silver lining is that the vagaries of the loopy Electoral College meant that his victory was extremely narrow and tapped into a unique and fortuitous (for him) set of circumstances. He benefited from low voter turnout: only 50% of eligible voters cast ballots and of those, about 25% voted for Trump.

But these things are inconsequential to the fact that he did win.

Americans have made a venal manchild their next president and already we are seeing emboldened white men attacking minorities. The Ku Klux Klan is celebrating. This is happening because Trump’s hateful, racist rally cries have been legitimized by his victory.

Americans should be ashamed at what they have done to themselves–and to the world. The American people are better than this–or so we had imagined and hoped. The apathy of the tens of millions who didn’t vote must also be held up as shameful in a country that has always prided itself on the strength of its democratic institutions. They have, through their inaction, helped elect a person who doesn’t even know how many amendments the U.S. Constitution has. What sane person would find it to be a good thing to have such ignorance in a president?

I would like to hold out hope here but the best I can manage is that maybe Trump won’t be as terrible as feared. But even in that I see a downside, in that it would help normalize his awfulness and make it that much easier for him to win re-election.

In conclusion: WTF America.

 

My throat hurts

October is my official “complain about all the stuff I haven’t complained about previously this year” month.

Tonight I’m complaining because my throat is sore and we are heading into a three-day weekend. The timing is unsurprising, my body has a knack for this sort of thing.

On the other hand, we are also heading into what will be the first big storm of the season, so it’s going to rain and blow and I’ll be happy to just curl up inside all weekend with a nice cup of hot chocolate, anyway. So lose-win(ish).

Also, I should correct the above, as it is already raining and blowing. And I had a cup of hot chocolate.

That is all.

Delicious Halloween eggnog

I know, you’re thinking, “Isn’t eggnog that thick, indulgently sweet stuff you drink over Christmas? Why are you talking about it in reference to Halloween? You must have the holidays mixed up, lol!”

And yet here it is, October 1st, and not only do the stores already have their Halloween candy (appearing when summer had barely officially concluded) but today I noticed whilst in the neighborhood grocery store that there was eggnog in the dairy section, next to the milk. I was there in the morning so there’s a good chance it was actually shelved the night before, when it was still September.

It’s popular to mock and jeer the commercialization of every holiday, official or otherwise. And for good reason. This is silly. They are going to be selling eggnog for the next three months.Their initial shipment will expire before Halloween. Before summer has been over for even a month. Before some people finally stop wearing open-toed sandals for the rest of the year.

I was tempted to get some.

I remained strong, though. I don’t want to encourage further acceleration of the great merging of all holidays, even though that seems inevitable. I figure we’ll be more than 50% of the way there if Valentine’s candy shows up before Christmas. This is a real possibility.

I do not like dog owners: My rant for 2016

Having given it some thought, I’ve come to the conclusion that no, I do not like dog owners.

I should add that I am only referring to ones I’ve encountered. I have no opinion on all of the others–yet.

But of those I have met, yep, I don’t like most of them. They are irresponsible and selfish, they often have poorly-trained dogs and show little regard for the safety or comfort of others.

Dogs can be dangerous, even tiny toy dogs can bite hard and if they’re not healthy, they can spread infection or worse. A dog that is off-leash is not under the owner’s control, no matter what the owner may think. “Oh, he always comes when I call!” may seem ironclad because that’s always what has happened before, but if the dog decides to ignore you, your ability to control it lies in how long it will take you to get to it and grab it by the collar–assuming it doesn’t turn on you.

Tonight I went for a short walk through Hume Park and back. I follow the usual route I take when running, going down the stairs to Lower Hume Park. Just past the bend on the trail is a large dog sniffing about. It’s off-leash. There is no way to physically get past the dog without getting within range of its mouth, which is presumably full of sharp doggie teeth. The dog hasn’t noticed me and may very well be as friendly as all get-out. I have no idea, as I’ve never seen it before. Its owner is not within view. I back off and decide to wait thirty seconds or so, thinking by then the owner will have caught up and both dog and owner will move on.

That doesn’t happen. Instead the dog is still there. I wait again. After the third strategic retreat the dog has moved over to the parking lot and is standing next to the open door of a truck, which presumably belongs to the owner, unless the dog has the amazing ability to drive motor vehicles. I am then able to proceed forward on the path without facing imminent potential mauling.

I’ve been attacked and bitten by dogs before, having done nothing to provoke them. I’ve just unluckily been within proximity when they decided to flip out for whatever reason. My childhood was a series of tetanus shots. I don’t wish to repeat this as an adult.

This could have been avoided by the owner simply leashing the dog, as required by law. But the majority of dog owners I see don’t do this (I should add that a lot of them do and are nice people and usually the leashed dogs seem pretty nice, too).

I walk up the hill past the off-leash dog park. This is a fenced-in area that nonetheless has signs warning people that they must still keep their dogs under control at all times. As I walk by–keeping well away from the fence–a large dog with the coloring of a doberman runs up to the fence and starts following along, growling at me and taking on body language that says something to the effect of, “I would like to snack on you.” This does not amuse me.

The dog’s owner is oblivious.

I mutter obscenities and finally offer the dog advise of a carnal nature, while continuing to walk along. The dog either listens to my request (doubtful but not entirely impossible) or more likely reaches the end of the imaginary territory it needs to defend and backs off. The owner continues to remain oblivious.

A responsible dog owner would not have a dog that would follow and growl at a stranger when in public for no reason. An irresponsible one would.

I do not like dog owners.

Also, here’s a sign that’s posted on the same path I was walking along. If only all dogs were this cute and cartoony.

Your dog shall not poop nor be free

I’m not sure if the fine is for having your dog unleashed, not cleaning up its poop or a combination of both. What I do know is $2,000 is a heck of a lot of money to risk for the sake of letting Spot walk around unleashed.

Also, that cartoony dog is apparently owned by the invisible man.

Why are t-shirts so hard?

I do not generally shop at Walmart because I don’t mind paying a little more to get stuff at stores that are more convenient to get to and also aren’t trying to dominate the global market with dubious practices. But sometimes I do because they have stuff that isn’t available elsewhere.

Take t-shirts for example. They sell a brand called George. I don’t know if this is named after George Walton or Curious George or some other George, all I know is the t-shirts are so cheap I don’t care if they don’t last. I just buy a bunch and wear them during the summer and recycle them when they start coming out of the wash with impossibly wrinkly collars and the like.

I know buying these t-shirts makes me in some small way a terrible person. I can live with that. $5 a pop is hard to resist.

But there’s a problem. I don’t fit the Walmart demographic. Or at least I’m pretty sure I don’t. When I go to the Mens section and find the George t-shirts, I find two immense displays of them in a multitude of colors. Some are $5, others are $7. I can’t tell why some are $2 more than others and I don’t care. $7 is still super cheap. When I ambled in yesterday (I had gone to Lougheed Town Centre for other things) I had a specific goal in mind. Most of my t-shirts are fairly neutral-looking: dark blues, slate grays and the like. They don’t, as they say, pop. I wanted to get some that said “It’s freaking summer, baby!” I went to one of the two giant displays, my eye immediately drawn to a huge pile of purple t-shirts. It was a nice purple, not dark but also not tracking toward lavender. It was bright. It popped. I then did what I always do. I started looking for the small size, as that’s what I wear.

There were a few mediums. There were more than a few larges. Extra large (XL)? Quite a few. XXL? Enough to construct the main tent for the Cirque du Soleil. Perhaps there was a stray small buried inside this massive pile of purple. But no, there was not. I approached a stack of bright, almost neon, green and got the same results. I currently weigh a little over 160 pounds and am working my way back to my normal weight of 150. I figure I could have walked out of that store with any color t-shirt I wanted if I only weighed twice as much.

But I do not.

I ended up getting a dark blue t-shirt and a nice bright red (the only small in that color) and a bright yellow (also the only small in that color). Among several hundred shirts (really, they had these suckers piled up) the number of smalls could be counted on one hand. One small hand.

I’m going to check out some other stores with not-Walmart pricing to see if this is, in fact, not a Walmart-specific phenomenon. Is the small-sized t-shirt guy really a tiny minority? I shall find out soon, in the name of science.

Is it the little things? Yes (even when they’re not donuts)

The first major update for Windows 10 came out recently. It adds the usual assortment of enhancements, fixes and tweaks, but of all of these things the one that pleases–nay, delights–me the most is allowing title bars to actually have color again.

In Windows 8 it was possible to adjust the color of the title bar but not the color of the text, which was always black. This meant you could make the text effectively invisible by making title bars black or some other dark shade. Windows 10 changed this by taking away all choice. You had black text on a white title bar, except for arbitrary apps Microsoft slapped color title bars on–and you also couldn’t adjust those, even to make them match the white ones. It was interface design channeled through a 1970 Soviet committee.

Now, though, I can have a friendly, soothing blue title bar on every program. I open Word and a wave of calm washes over me, like a gentle and warm tide. Then I struggle to remember how to make hidden text visible and start grinding my teeth. Focus on the title bar, I think, let the blue calm me. And it works. That and closing Word. Really, after a billion versions Microsoft should be doing more than slapping a coat of paint on the thing every couple of years. I’m leaning toward going back to WriteMonkey or some other tool that focuses more on actual writing and less on doing everything ever with text and stuffing the means to do these multitude of things in an endless series of icons, ribbons and dialog choices. (Hidden text can be shown by going to File > Options > Display and checking “Hidden text” under the “Always show these formatting marks on the screen” option. But you probably already knew that.)

Anyway, colored title bars are nice. Windows 10 is now officially 23% better.

How not to get your Groove™ on in Windows 10

Overall I am enjoying the improvements of Windows 10. Its quirks and issues have been minor irritants at best. I tried most of the included apps but they have so far proven too limiting in one way or another, even if they do include some nice/handy features (it’s not a good sign when the outlook.com web mail has more features than the dedicated Windows 10 mail app). There was one app in particular that I really wanted to commit to: Groove.

Groove is the current incarnation of Microsoft’s music app (see also: Xbox Music, Zune, etc. etc.) Like iTunes it will play your local music and let you buy more from a digital store. I wanted Groove to be groovy because while the name is dumb (even Edge is better) iTunes is a bit of a mess and I’m quite willing to move away from it as my primary music player should a better option present itself.

On the plus side Groove is minimal. You will not be overwhelmed with options. You will barely be whelmed with options. It has a light theme and a dark theme. It can import your iTunes or Google Music library. It will play your music. That covers most of its features.

I import my iTunes library. A lot of the artist pictures are weird and scary, a strange mix of artists when they were young and artists as they are at age 150. The artist pictures are all presented in circles, which is a UI convention I really don’t care for and I can’t say why, exactly. Album covers are mercifully presented as squares instead of, say, trapezoids. The importing of my iTunes library initially seems fine. I play some tracks. I like that Groove has large controls. It does what I want it to. It will even let me pin music to the Start menu if for some reason I absolutely need to listen to Pink Floyd in as few clicks as possible.

Then I decide to listen to 69 Love Songs by The Magnetic Fields. This is a triple album that came out in 1999, when CDs were not yet considered quaint. As such it really was originally released as three physical discs. The iTunes version preserves this format, even labeling each Disc 1, Disc 2 and Disc 3. Groove preserves the notion of the songs spanning three discs, but it sorts the songs like so: 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, etc. Yes, it wants to play the first song from each disc, then the second song from each disc and so on. This is, of course, madness.

I order it to find album info and it comes up with a lengthy list of choices, all of which contain fewer than the album’s 69 songs (most often because each only contains one disc’s worth of music). There is one entry that has all 69 songs and as a bonus has the correct cover art. I choose it, content that although Groove was bad, this fix is simple and painless.

I look over the copious collection of songs and something seems amiss. Closer study reveals Groove has duplicated a number of tracks. Further inspection shows the duplicates are in fact different songs that have been mislabeled. There is no way to edit the properties of a song from within Groove. Undeterred, I ordered Groove to find the album info again and when I choose the same album as before it highlights “problem” tracks and allows me to “fix” them by choosing other tracks to take their place. After carefully matching everything up–by checking the album in iTunes–I confirm my changes and am presented with the same garbled list of duplicates. Well, not entirely the same. On its second attempt Groove has garbled a slightly different set of songs, possibly for variety. The only option now is to delete the album from my library. This also deletes the files from my iTunes folder. This is what you call sub-optimal.

I gave up. I will probably try Groove again because I’m silly and stubborn about these things, but it’s unlikely I will ever really use it again because I have no confidence that the great mangling of songs is something that will ever be fixed (and to be fair to iTunes–how the very utterance grates–when it mucks up some songs it happily lets you dive into the track’s info and edit to your delight to set things right).

Groove, we shall not play music together.

Nerd rage: Razer Synapse 2.0 software

I originally posted this on Broken Forum but the process bugged me so much that I feel obligated to repost it here.

I hooked up my Deathadder 2013 edition mouse to my MacBook because I switched over to a Logitech 700s on my PC and was no longer using the Deathadder there. Using the built-in drivers the Deathadder seemed a bit twitchy on the Mac, with the cursor often leaping from the external monitor back to the laptop’s display. I decided to install the much-maligned Razer Synapse 2.0 driver configuration thingie, which requires you to be online (initially, at least).

First I had to create an account. The system kept telling me that my chosen username and/or password were bad without providing any details as to why. I finally figured out it didn’t like special characters in passwords. What is this, the 1890s? Anyway, I got to where the account was created and apparently missed a verification email with a link I had to click on (because the page made no mention of it). I tried my username/password combo, knowing it was correctly entered but again the system kept saying it wasn’t (due to the aforementioned unmentioned verification requirement).

Here’s the best part, though: after several “unsuccessful” attempts I was locked out.

Of a driver.

I could not configure my mouse unless I waited at least five minutes first. At that point the system would generously grant me the privilege of entering my username and password again.

Instead I uninstalled the software and made a promise to myself to never buy another Razer product. (The uninstall naturally did not allow me to just drag the icon off the menu bar, I had to hunt down a separate uninstall app in the Applications/Library folder. But it is gone now. Hopefully.)