Bad running weather: the list

Here is a list of the worst types of weather to run in, according to me (since I’m the one who has to run in it), from least worst to worst worst:

14. Overcast and light breeze. This is actually ideal conditions. It is usually never too cold or warm when the weather is like this.
13. Moderate wind. Moderate wind can be a tad annoying, especially if I don’t have my cap on securely.
12. Warm sun. If it’s warm, I get hot and sweaty but it’s manageable.
11. Light rain. The only issue with light rain is that sometimes my iPod gets wet straight through my shorts’ pocket.
10. Snow. I’ve only run once in light snow and it was fun. I’m thinking a foot of snow would probably be less so.
9. Cold rain. Cold rain means cold hands and if you wear gloves they need to be waterproof.
8. Hard rain. Getting soaked to the skin is kind of refreshing. Unfortunately if it’s raining hard, it’s almost always cold, too. Not so refreshing. iPod also gets drenched.
7. Hail. I’ve never run in hail. I imagine getting pelted with little ice rocks is less than pleasant.
6. Extreme cold. I’ve run in sub-freezing conditions and been fine. I’m thinking Arctic tundra-type cold here.
5. Heavy wind. The resistance means you work a lot harder to achieve the same result and my cap has to be on tight enough to cut off circulation so it doesn’t fly away.
4. Hot sun. I wilt on hot days. My body feels like a furnace and I’m left parched as all get-out. Dry mouth and lips are yucky.
3. Hard rain and heavy wind. Likeliest weather to make me wonder to myself, ‘What was I thinking?’ when on the run.
2. Hot sun and heavy wind. Heat dries you out, the wind makes it harder to run and dries you out even more. Bleah.

And the worst weather to run in is:

1. Dogs. See here.

The slug run (at Burnaby Lake)

Distance: 11.21 km
Weather: Sun, cloud, light shower
Temp: 17ºC
Wind: light breeze
Calories burned: 784
Average pace: 5:10/km
Total distance to date: 878 km

UPDATE, November 7, 2025:

Yes, I am updating this post over 14 years later after randomly coming across it. In particular, I wanted to make note that back in 2011 I ran using a pedometer strapped to one of my running shoes--the Nike one that worked with an app on my iPod nano. This was never as accurate as GPS-based tracking, but it was off more than I realized at the time.

In 2011, the Burnaby Lake loop did not have any distance markers. When they were added a few years after this run was recorded, it revealed that starting and ending a run at the 0K marker would be a total of 10.3 km, much less than the 11.21 km I thought I'd run.

Using the description of where I started and stopped the run, I am reasonably confident I began the run at what is now the 0K marker and ended it just shortly past the 10K marker. This means, with a total time of 58 minutes, my overall pace was not an amazing 5:10/km, but actually closer to 5:48/km, which is slower than my usual runs as of November 2025. The copious slugs remain accurate, however.

After more than two years of running at China Creek park I finally tried something new. Tonight, Jeff and I drive to Burnaby Lake and I did my run on the trail that circumnavigates the lake, a distance of approximately 11 km. I started at the parking lot near the Burnaby Equestrian Centre and ran counter-clockwise, finishing with a total distance of 11.21 km and a time of one second under 58 minutes.

There are two remarkable things about this run. The first was the huge number of black slugs on the trail. It was like a 1950s science fiction movie where black slugs invaded the Earth, except the slugs were normal-sized and not really invading. I successfully dodged all of them.

The other remarkable thing was my time. I finished with an overall pace of 5:10/km. This is a full seven seconds better than my previous best pace, and it was also the only time I’ve come in under 5 minutes on the first three km (and the fourth was only one second over). I’m not really sure why my pace was so much better. Was it running in the early evening after three full meals? Was it the excitement of a new course? The variety on not looping around the same path a dozen and a half times? Alignment of the planets? All of these things?

I did my usual — keeping the pace steady and there are several long straight stretches that made it easier to maintain speed (the northern Cottonwood Trail stands out in that regard), but I also had my share of miscues. One time I mistakenly turned down a path to a viewpoint and had to swing back onto the main trail. When the trail turns south it enters a stretch I hadn’t anticipated where it crosses a road, parallels another, goes over a parking lot and generally looks very un-trail-like. It also doesn’t help that most of the trail affords no view of the lake at all, so you can’t use it as a navigation aid except to know that it’s ‘somewhere over that way’.

The trail itself is fairly good for running. It’s not too hard-packed and the stretches over concrete and pavement are brief. There are a couple of points on the southern side where you have to run along wooden boardwalks built over top of the bog but they’re in good condition. It’s all very scenic and woodsy.

I look forward to doing it again, though I suspect it will be awhile before I can beat my 5:10 pace.

Chart (blue indicates the run was done clockwise):

kmJul 11Jul 9Jul 6Jul 4Jul 1Jun 28Jun 26Jun 21Jun 18
1 km4:544:585:084:585:044:584:595:004:53
2 km4:564:585:115:025:065:035:055:045:01
3 km4:585:035:145:085:075:055:105:075:04
4 km5:015:075:175:125:095:085:135:115:09
5 km5:035:105:205:145:115:115:155:145:13
6 km5:035:125:225:155:125:135:195:155:15
7 km5:045:155:255:175:145:155:215:175:18
8 km5:065:175:275:195:165:165:235:195:21
9 km5:085:195:305:215:175:185:255:205:23
10 km5:105:205:315:215:175:195:275:215:24
11 km4:595:19

The unexpected run

Distance: 10.02 km
Weather: Sunny
Temp: 20ºC
Wind: light breeze
Calories burned: 701
Average pace: 5:20/km
Total distance to date: 867 km

The unexpected part of this run is how it turned out much better than I had hoped.

I decided to wait an extra day after Wednesday’s run because my right shin, though not hurting at all to walk, was a bit sensitive when pressure was applied in the right (or wrong, according to my shin) spot. I have been erring on the side of caution this year to prevent injury so instead of running on Friday I ran today.

Because I had plans in the evening, I broke my usual rule and ran in the mid-afternoon sun. It was 20ºC so not hot but when the breeze died down it still felt plenty warm. I knew after the first two km that I had started out too fast and was concerned that I would lag in the middle part of the run and have a slower overall time as a result. I had also made the mistake of not eating lunch beforehand (I was thinking of having it after the run), which meant I was running with minimal fuel. This, combined with the warmth, made the run feel much harder. By the time I got to the last km I really wanted it to be over.

My hunch on the start was correct — I posted a brisk 4:58/km on the first km and then did the exact same on the second. I then dropped five seconds from 2K to 3K and another four going from 3K to 4K, so I did indeed start flagging in the middle. However, I managed to find a steadier rhythm after that and ended with an overall pace of 5:20/km, a quite good result (third fastest 10K, only 3 seconds off my best run) and a full 11 seconds better than my last effort.

A group of people doing some kind of weird orienteering/weigh-in/whatever thing were annoyingly clustering on one part of the trail a number of times through the run but other than that there were no other unusual events to report.

Chart (blue indicates the run was done clockwise):

km Jul 9 Jul 6 Jul 4 Jul 1 Jun 28 Jun 26 Jun 23 Jun 21 Jun 18
1 km 4:58 5:08 4:58 5:04 4:58 4:59 4:59 5:00 4:53
2 km 4:58 5:11 5:02 5:06 5:03 5:05 5:05 5:04 5:01
3 km 5:03 5:14 5:08 5:07 5:05 5:10 5:09 5:07 5:04
4 km 5:07 5:17 5:12 5:09 5:08 5:13 5:12 5:11 5:09
5 km 5:10 5:20 5:14 5:11 5:11 5:15 5:15 5:14 5:13
6 km 5:12 5:22 5:15 5:12 5:13 5:19 5:15 5:15
7 km 5:15 5:25 5:17 5:14 5:15 5:21 5:17 5:18
8 km 5:17 5:27 5:19 5:16 5:16 5:23 5:19 5:21
9 km 5:19 5:30 5:21 5:17 5:18 5:25 5:20 5:23
10 km 5:20 5:31 5:21 5:17 5:19 5:27 5:21 5:24
11 km 5:19

Book review: Cosm

Cosm is a 1998 SF novel by Gregory Benford. I’ve read and enjoyed several other of his novels, including Great Sky River and Timescape. The concept of Cosm intrigued me but when I first picked it up years ago I only got about ten pages in before abandoning it because it’s one of those books that doesn’t jump right into the main plot right away. In fact, the beginning is rather boring.

This year I picked it up again and finished it and I’m left with a feeling of indifference. Cosm is not a bad book but it is perhaps a badly told story. The premise is neat — an accident with a super-collider leads to the creation of a small sphere, the titular cosm. The cosm provides a literal window to a miniature universe growing at an exponentially accelerated rate within it.

The protagonist of the story is a stubborn, abrasive black physicist with an inept social life named Alica Butterworth. After the accident, she claims ownership of the cosm and returns with it to the University of California Irvine where she teaches and researches. The novel follows both the politics surrounding ownership and treatment of the cosm as well as her research into it. The problem is that most of the story focuses on the politics, with rival universities, the government, religious groups and others weighing in on the matter, while the actual study of the phenomenon is handled in a bland, perfunctory manner, as if it’s just another research project to write papers on.

Cosm ends up as more a look into the battles professors face at educational institutions and less a look at a potentially world-changing experiment. As such, it proves to be a disappointment. It does pull off the neat trick of ending with both a bang and a whimper, though. Benford completists may want to check it out but there are better SF novels out there.

The 25 degree run

Distance: 10.02 km
Weather: Sunny
Temp: 25ºC
Wind: light breeze
Calories burned: 700
Average pace: 5:31/km
Total distance to date: 857 km

Hot.

I waited until early evening to run and it was still 25ºC in the shade when I set out. As a result I started out sluggish, with a first km of 5:08 and maintained that slow-but-steady (and sweaty) pace throughout, finishing at a little over 55 minutes and with an average pace of 5:31/km. Normally I’d be disappointed but I’m actually pleased I kept at it and did the full 10K.

My calves were feeling sore toward the end and if I misstepped I could feel a twinge in my shins but the legs feel fine now. Complicating matters further were two near-identical insect bites, one each on the back of each calf — twins! They itched like mad but I couldn’t stop to scratch them and had nothing at the house to kill the itchiness before heading out.

Since I ran counter-clockwise I didn’t spend the majority of the run bobbing and weaving around others and the warmer temperature seemed to have frightened off most of the runners, anyway.

I had to take a whiz before the run and risked using the port-o-potty. Much like last year, it was strangely odor-free. However, being essentially a giant plastic tub sitting all day in the sun it was hot as all get-out inside and I had fleeting horror story thoughts of the door jamming and getting stuck in there, so I tinkled briskly.

Post-run there was a stupid bee at the water fountain. A few splashes seemed to convince it that it was raining and it left or perhaps it just went to gather the rest of the hive for revenge. I scooted off after taking a few sips before I could find out the answer.

Chart (blue indicates the run was done clockwise):

km Jul 6 Jul 4 Jul 1 Jun 28 Jun 26 Jun 23 Jun 21 Jun 18 Jun 16
1 km 5:08 4:58 5:04 4:58 4:59 4:59 5:00 4:53 5:05
2 km 5:11 5:02 5:06 5:03 5:05 5:05 5:04 5:01 5:09
3 km 5:14 5:08 5:07 5:05 5:10 5:09 5:07 5:04 5:13
4 km 5:17 5:12 5:09 5:08 5:13 5:12 5:11 5:09 5:16
5 km 5:20 5:14 5:11 5:11 5:15 5:15 5:14 5:13 5:19
6 km 5:22 5:15 5:12 5:13 5:19 5:15 5:15
7 km 5:25 5:17 5:14 5:15 5:21 5:17 5:18
8 km 5:27 5:19 5:16 5:16 5:23 5:19 5:21
9 km 5:30 5:21 5:17 5:18 5:25 5:20 5:23
10 km 5:31 5:21 5:17 5:19 5:27 5:21 5:24
11 km 5:19

The 180 degree run

Distance: 10.02 km
Weather: Sunny
Temp: 18-22ºC
Wind: light breeze
Calories burned: 700
Average pace: 5:21/km
Total distance to date: 847 km

Tonight’s run was frustrating for several reasons.

On the plus side, there were two ball games in progress and I did not get bonked by a baseball at any point. Yay! I also finished with a pace of 5:21/km, a time that a few weeks ago I would have considered awesome and now think of as merely good (it’s still my fourth fastest for a 10K and only four seconds off my previous — and fastest — run).

On the not-as-positive side I developed some cramping early on that really threw off my pace. It lasted for a few km and if you look at the chart below it’s remarkably clear where they hit. For the first 2 km my pace was actually better than my previous run but then I drop by a huge six seconds going into the third km. I drop another four seconds after that and it’s only after the cramps ease off midway through that I find my natural rhythm and finish stronger than I would have otherwise. I knew I’d regret eating those chicken samosas.

This was one of my clockwise runs but I didn’t actually run clockwise the entire way due to the heavy traffic on the trail tonight. There were people walking, people walking with dogs (on and off leash), people jogging, people jogging with dogs (on and off leash), a mother and her wee son, the latter of which was wobbly riding a similarly wee bike, plus a few bonus dogs just generally running about all dog-like.

None of this would normally be a problem, but in running clockwise I was heading toward the majority of them and nearly every one seemed baffled as to how to share the path with someone moving in the opposite direction. They would drift across the path, making it hard to pass. They would move directly into my way, they would stop for no apparent reason, they would toss balls across the path so their dogs could become tripping hazards. Shortly after the 5K mark and with the cramps cleared up, I pivoted around and changed direction, doing the second half counter-clockwise. It was a lot more relaxing. By coincidence, or perhaps feeling that they had won, most of the people disappeared at the same time.

My knee was a bit cranky but is fine now and my legs likewise felt a bit tired but seem to be recovering normally afterward.

Chart (blue indicates the run was done clockwise):

km Jul 4 Jul 1 Jun 28 Jun 26 Jun 23 Jun 21 Jun 18 Jun 16 Jun 13
1 km 4:58 5:04 4:58 4:59 4:59 5:00 4:53 5:05 5:02
2 km 5:02 5:06 5:03 5:05 5:05 5:04 5:01 5:09 5:07
3 km 5:08 5:07 5:05 5:10 5:09 5:07 5:04 5:13 5:10
4 km 5:12 5:09 5:08 5:13 5:12 5:11 5:09 5:16 5:14
5 km 5:14 5:11 5:11 5:15 5:15 5:14 5:13 5:19 5:18
6 km 5:15 5:12 5:13 5:19 5:15 5:15 5:20
7 km 5:17 5:14 5:15 5:21 5:17 5:18 5:21
8 km 5:19 5:16 5:16 5:23 5:19 5:21 5:22
9 km 5:21 5:17 5:18 5:25 5:20 5:23 5:24
10 km 5:21 5:17 5:19 5:27 5:21 5:24 5:25
11 km 5:19

Soon I shall smash words for fun (and maybe profit)

I now have a (at the moment rather spartan) Smashwords profile. What is Smashwords? Allow me to quote:

Smashwords is an ebook publishing and distribution platform for ebook authors, publishers and readers. We offer multi-format, DRM-free ebooks, ready for immediate sampling and purchase, and readable on any e-reading device.

You can read more on the Smashwords About page.

Much like the fellow in this Quarter to Three thread, I am planning on submitting some of my short stories (and ultimately bundling them into a collection at some point), some for free, some for a very modest cost, all in an effort to get my writing out there. I’ve imposed a deadline of one week (!) to get the first two stories out — both are already written, they just need to be fine-tuned and formatted. One will be gratis, the other likely to sell for the princely sum of 99 cents.

I shall report back with my success or lack thereof in due time.

The steady run

Distance: 10.02 km
Weather: Sun and cloud
Temp: 18ºC
Wind: light breeze
Calories burned: 700
Average pace: 5:17/km
Total distance to date: 837 km

What better way to celebrate the nation’s birthday than with a stinking long run?

As expected, it was pretty quiet when I got to China Creek late in the afternoon. It had been cloudy for much of the day but was clearing up as I got to the park and most of the run was done under the sun, though it was not warm enough to be a bother.

My initial km was a whopping six seconds shorter than my previous run, which surprised me as I didn’t feel I was that far off my pace. However, I felt good and kept my pace consistent. In the end the consistency paid off as I ended up beating my previous best of 5:19/km by two seconds (three on my iPod but the cursed Nike+ site rounded up, as usual). As you can see by the chart below it wasn’t until the halfway point that I caught up to Tuesday’s pace but then I did a better job of maintaining my pace. I stopped at 10K despite feeling good because my right shin had been feeling tender (hence the two day layoff since the last run) and I didn’t want to push it. Both legs held up fine, though.

Joan congratulated me incorrectly for my farthest run yet. Oh, Joan, you silly but well-meaning person!

Nothing unusual at the park today, which is kind of a change of pace.

Chart (blue indicates the run was done clockwise):

km Jul 1 Jun 28 Jun 26 Jun 23 Jun 21 Jun 18 Jun 16 Jun 13
1 km 5:04 4:58 4:59 4:59 5:00 4:53 5:05 5:02
2 km 5:06 5:03 5:05 5:05 5:04 5:01 5:09 5:07
3 km 5:07 5:05 5:10 5:09 5:07 5:04 5:13 5:10
4 km 5:09 5:08 5:13 5:12 5:11 5:09 5:16 5:14
5 km 5:11 5:11 5:15 5:15 5:14 5:13 5:19 5:18
6 km 5:12 5:13 5:19 5:15 5:15 5:20
7 km 5:14 5:15 5:21 5:17 5:18 5:21
8 km 5:16 5:16 5:23 5:19 5:21 5:22
9 km 5:17 5:18 5:25 5:20 5:23 5:24
10 km 5:17 5:19 5:27 5:21 5:24 5:25
11 km 5:19

Because you can never have too many profiles

I recently added another link to my small collection of, uh, links. This one is for my Fitocracy profile. Fitocracy is an exercise-tracking site that combines the social aspects of Facebook with the level-up mechanics of a video game. It even has quests. For a geek that works out (yes, I know…) this is a heady combination. I am part of the Quarter to Three group there and as of this writing am level 7. This doesn’t give me a nifty title as I had hoped for but I look forward to level 8 all the same. Only 22 points to go…

Will this ship finally sail?

This is one of those ‘may be embarrassing to look back a year later’ posts.

Today I began the second draft of my novel, The Ferry. It was written as part of National Novel Writing Month in November 2009 and you can see the play-by-play on its fevered creation in this thread on the Quarter to the Three forums. In 21 days I wrote a complete short novel — 50,810 words in total. It had started out as a short story back in 1993 that outgrew its short story status before eventually being abandoned. Over the years I revisited it, trying to get it steaming along again, one time even switching it from its first person narrative to third person but I could never figure out where to go with it and so it remained unfinished.

The ‘just for fun’ approach of NaNoWriMo took the pressure off, as I briefly recount in this blog post written the day after completing it.

The second draft will probably take a good deal longer to finish but I am relieved and happy to have gone through the experience.

Ho ho!

And so tonight, after a number of false starts, I begin the second draft. My marginal goal is to have the second draft done before NaNoWriMo 2011 begins. That gives me four months. I vow to update on this come October 31st!

The 11K run

Distance: 11.04 km
Weather: Cloudy
Temp: 17-18ºC
Wind: light
Calories burned: 772
Average pace: 5:19/km
Total distance to date: 827 km

Tonight I felt like Goldilocks. With the temperature a comfy 18ºC, a light breeze from the east and the cooling of the night air, conditions were just right for today’s run. My biggest worry was getting conked by a baseball by one of the two games in progress. Fortunately none of the balls turned into noggin homing missiles.

Obligatory odd thing on the run: An old white lab was strolling and sitting about for most of my run and until the very end I never saw the owner. In fact, I’m still not sure the person I saw the dog with at the end was the owner. In any case, toward the end of the run the dog decided to lay down square in the middle of the path. From a distance he looked like a large white rock that had been dropped into place. On my first lap past him I hooked right. He stirred slightly. On the second lap I hooked left and he stirred not at all. Dogs are weird.

The other thing that stood out tonight was the large number of runners. There were half a dozen out at once and more than that over the length of my run. Nearly all were running counter-clockwise, so I felt a bit like someone driving down the right side of the road in England. No collisions to report, though I do roll my foot over an exposed root once as I dodged a fellow jogger.

The run itself went very well. I had a good start and a much better pace than the last run and felt no discomfort. Toward the end my second wind had kicked in nicely and I opted to do what I have never done before and go for that extra km. I finished with 11.04 km on the run and an average pace of 5:19/km — my best pace ever for a 10K. I am pleased. So was Joan, who, instead of giving me congrats for yet another phantom 500K completed, instead accurately acknowledged my farthest run to date. Thanks, Joan!

Chart (blue indicates the run was done clockwise):

km Jun 28 Jun 26 Jun 23 Jun 21 Jun 18 Jun 16 Jun 13
1 km 4:58 4:59 4:59 5:00 4:53 5:05 5:02
2 km 5:03 5:05 5:05 5:04 5:01 5:09 5:07
3 km 5:05 5:10 5:09 5:07 5:04 5:13 5:10
4 km 5:08 5:13 5:12 5:11 5:09 5:16 5:14
5 km 5:11 5:15 5:15 5:14 5:13 5:19 5:18
6 km 5:13 5:19 5:15 5:15 5:20
7 km 5:15 5:21 5:17 5:18 5:21
8 km 5:16 5:23 5:19 5:21 5:22
9 km 5:18 5:25 5:20 5:23 5:24
10 km 5:19 5:27 5:21 5:24 5:25
11 km 5:19