Instagzam and other logo redesigns

Today, Instagram updated its logo wordmark. CNET had a nice image of the before and after, presented below as after and before:

Instagzam vs. Instagram

Although I don’t think AI was used in the creation of the new logo, it still smells of it in the way AI messes up things, like:

  • Goofy kerning
  • Goofy mix of cursive and non-cursive letters (apparently trying to call back to the previous logo the same way someone riding a bike off a picnic table and crashing calls back to Evel Knievel)
  • Goofy letters (notably the R, G and S. Someone on Ars Technica commented that the S looks like a side boob and now I can’t unsee it.)
  • Despite all the above, still looking limp and bland

Speaking of Ars, their creative director Aurich Lawson wrote a rare and relatively brief article offering his thoughts on the redesign (spoiler: Like most of the internet, he does not like it).

My take? Yes, it’s bad. The old logo is instantly recognizable, legible and stylish. The new one is a graceless “reeks of committee” thing. It’s also exactly the kind of logo I’d expect a big (and awful) tech company like Meta to produce in 2026.

This led me to other logo redesigns of recent years, such as the also awful one for Pringles:

Quaint, quaint, groovy, pretty good, perfectly fine, blech!

Here, I think they really hit it in 2009, though 2001 is pretty good, too. The flattened, gormless 2021 redesign is so bad that the longer you look at the face, the less it looks like a face and just a set of weird shapes. It also inspired me to do this:

I am your nightmare.

You’re welcome!

Another good (bad) example is Jaguar’s recent logo redesign:

Cool cat vs. A mix of letters

It went from instantly recognizable to something absolutely generic that says nothing (it’s still way better than Instagram’s, even at that).

In conclusion: Logo design is a fine balancing act between art, character, and image (the type you project). We live in an era where almost every logo out there is being flattened, simplified and stripped of all character and identity (see also: Jaguar’s impressively bad update). The only reason I can think why this is happening is companies are going cheap by making logos so simple they can be slapped on anything at any size with no need for adjustment. If it’s not this, then somehow bad design has become good design, the same way 2 + 2 = 5.

I need a new logo (2026 edition)

What the title says. The text logo is…fine, but it’s not even actual text, it’s an image of text. And it’s a little plain. I feel like I need to go all 2005 retro for this.

Although it does disturb me a bit that 2005 is now retro.

Here is one I whipped up in Canva a few years ago that I did not use, because even I have my limits:

I changed my logo and realized why it looked familiar…

The new logo uses the same font but adds an underline and changes the colour from all-orange to green and yellow. Green and yellow work well together, but there was something a little too familiar. Then I realized it.

I had created the Subway logo.

So now I have to change it again.

My Subway-ish logo:

Fake edit: I’m going with this for now. At least it doesn’t make me crave a six-inch chicken sub.

Not a fake edit: Now I’m trying a yellow and gray version. I’ll probably keep changing it, but won’t update this post every time, so the true level of my madness will not be fully revealed.